Anyone shop at WalMart regularly? Anyone encountered any propaganda? Walmart Partners with DHS on "If You See Something, Say Something" Campaign WalMart is now in the business of securing the homeland from suspicious characters. Way to go, big business! The video announcement can be seen many places, but the following is a special edition of it. Notice the suspicious activity taking place in the background. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iBOYS_m1yF0 If the author of this blog entry submitted this to Homeland Security, my bets are that they would probably investigate him, or tap his phones or whatever, if they aren't doing so already. The entire thing can be viewed at Szandor Blestman's blog, linked in the title of the entry above. Yes, Szandor, I have a feeling they're not interested in real threats.
Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! Whoa! I see something, but I'm afraid to remember what I saw. Yikes!Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Wow! :jawdrop: Perhaps you haven't noticed the Obama Administration? The fact that it is a Democratic administration, and thus, allegedly a bunch of lefties??? Who appointed Janet Napolitano??? Ronald Reagan? Glenn Beck??? Who came up with the program??? Not WalMart, that's for sure. This is really hilarious, if you completely ignore under which party and administration this has been formulated under, and simply blame WalMart as being a bunch of "righties". Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Obama isn't a lefty, are you kidding me? The Department of Homeland Security was a Bush administration invention. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Right. And Democrats and Republicans alike have voted to renew the unPATRIOTic Act with a spirit of true bipartisanship every time it's come to a vote. Way to work together, Left and Right! Way to rape across the aisle! Regardless of the Mulatto Messiah's true political nature (he belongs to the Usurpers and Backstabbers Party, though his affiliation is kept well hidden), neither he nor any of his cohorts on the fake Left have made any motions to dissolve needless institutions or their unAmerican policies, other than motions of the mouth aka lipservice. And true to your chimeric nomenclature, it is difficult to figure out which is the front, and which is the rear. "Another reason not to shop at Walmart, that bunch of Righties..." you say, while I recall quite well what you think of unmanned drones shooting up children and civilians in countries we aren't even at war with. Yes, Spidergoat, your "values" certainly are an ungodly, queer melange. Good day!
Yes, I do not march in lockstep to the party, but the worst aspects of the Patriot act were rescinded. Is there something specific about it you object to? I'm not in principle against Federal powers, just unconstitutional ones.
Another case of someone who saw something, said something, and continues to speak... Where did this whole recent push for airport body scanners and other nonsense from the TSA come from? Kurt Haskell Blows Whistle On Underwear Bomber: Given Bomb By US Government To Boost TSA Budget & Implement Body Scanners I've paid very close attention to this story from the moment it broke, and all the details that slipped through the cracks (or were, more truthfully, willed into darkness by the controlled mainstream media), but have procrastinated in posting about it, but since alot has happened in this case since the so-called Underwear Bombing attempt in Detroit over the Christmas holiday in 2009, it goes right along with this entire subject. The lawyer/passenger/potential victim, Kurt Haskell, was very quick to come out with his eyewitness account of Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab being escorted through security by an unknown man in an expensive suit, who claimed something to the effect of, "He doesn't have a passport, but he needs to be on this plane, we do this all the time." Mr. Haskell says the "Sharp Dressed Man" (who appeared to be of Indian descent, but had an American accent) argued briefly with the personnel at the gate, and then heard one of them say that he would have to talk with a manager. Apparently that discussion was successful, as Abdulmutallab was on the plane later, "detonating" a device that did nothing more than cause burns to his body. Haskell recounted also that it took nearly a half-hour for an evacuation of the plane to be initiated after the incendiary device went off, which he said was a little suspicious, especially if there were a possible second bomb on the plane, which they searched for, if I recall correctly, after the fact. I'm not able at this time to find that info. Once in the lobby, some bomb sniffing dogs checked out the passengers and luggage, stopping at a black bag owned by an Indian man, who Haskell said appeared to be the same ethnicity of the Sharp Dressed Man who escorted Mutallab through security. The man (who he called the Man in Orange) was taken into a room by security, and he was told by an FBI person present that "You all saw what just happened, so I think you know for your safety you need to evacuate this area." Later, when FBI interviewed him at his law office, he said they did their best to deny certain things, especially about the Sharp Dressed Man. Amsterdam airport officials claimed that over 200 hours of security video showed nothing, which is very typical to anyone who follows cases like this. I find it highly unlikely that there was no pertinent footage of that boarding gate. In fact, it sounds really laughable. The FBI seemed to shy away from the Man in Orange, as well, although they later admitted he was arrested, but not that it had anything to do with bomb-sniffing dogs stopping at his luggage. They also appeared to want to confuse Haskell with some photos of possible suspects, which he thought, after all the other suspicious actions and denials and runarounds, that maybe they were intentionally trying to discredit him and his recall. He commented at the time that while his story, which was corroborated by several eyewitnesses on various details, had not changed, the FBI had changed their story several times. Which again, is very typical to those who watch events like this unfold. One other mysterious thing was an eyewitness on the plane (or possibly two or more, but many have not come foward) about a man with a video camera who allegedly taped the entire flight from Amsterdam to Detroit, and as if on cue, had turned around to film in the direction of Mutallab, possibly before any of the scuffle had even begun. One would think that video evidence, as with the airport's "nonexistent" boarding camera footage, would be in high demand. I wonder very seriously if that person was in on something. If I recall (it's been a while since I heard some of these testimonies), at least one eyewitness account said that not only was Abdulmutallab trying to put out the fire, but he seemed confused, like maybe he didn't expect it to happen? Other accounts said as he was escorted away that he appeared in a trance or drug-induced stupor. It is officially admitted he was allowed on the plane... http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=17505 That story I believe originally was reported in Detroit News, but has now apparently disappeared from their archives. Which, again, is very typical. Nonexistent camera footage, FBI denials, and important details in stories that have a tendency to vanish from servers after a short while. Now, as of late, the Underwear Bombing trial is in its preliminary stages, complete with a lack of other eyewitnesses interested in it; Haskell says that at the pre-trial hearings, he is not only the other passenger present, but that all his contact information with other witnesses is no longer valid. I also recollect him saying that at least on the persons was scared of coming forward, and that another passenger had contacted him and apparently was trying to get him to recant or change his mind on certain aspects. I will continue in a second post.
I'm not aware of its latest incarnation, but I can assure you, we never needed the Department of Homoland Insecurity to begin with.
The important tie in here, is that within days, Michael "Skeletor" Chertoff, former Homeland Security director, was on TV peddling his Rapescanner machines saying how the Underwear Bomber incident required his specific remedy.. which of course he directly profits from, being that his consulting firm has the Rapescanner manufacturer as a client. Well, at least we can hope some AMERICAN jobs were created by that contract?!?!? Or have they also outsourced or Homeland Stupidity to China?
From a January 2010 posting on Haskell's blog: Note that these are initial musings from Haskell. Some of the details are clearer now. I also believe that recent developments, about which I am just becoming aware of, are showing that there have been attempts to withhold information by the government in the hearings, including evidence related to the actual bomb itself. Just a few months ago, I was surprised (not!) to hear a quick news item that the government thought (probably hoping for!) that a plea deal was in the works in the case. Which of course would mean all of the unimportant (actually probably damning) details wouldn't have to be aired. He also refuses to work with his court-appointed lawyer, for some reason or other.
Interesting article... U.S.-Israeli Complicity in Terror Plot, FBI, Media Cover-Up Flight 253 Assistance (UPDATES) I recently heard that this same ICTS Israeli company was present at the airport in Russia that recently had a deadly bomb attack. Israeli ICTS Connection To Pollard & Schiphol Airport More .. Israeli 'Security' Firm ICTS Helped Provide 'Security' at Russia's Domodedovo Airport All 9/11 Airports Serviced by One Israeli Owned Company
