So God would be want you want God to be. Just like when you thought you believed in God. But that doesn’t work, as we can only pretend for so long. Everything is evidence of God! Duh!!! Fits right in with His definition. That’s true. But what’s that got to do with anything. Nevertheless, in the future when you bring “Nurk the Great” up, in a discussion, I will know who you are talking about. Having both reached the understanding that you just made up a random character for no good reason. We could switch the discussion to why you would do such a thing. I don’t see it like that. If you think that you would know God exists, because you could see the evidence, should it arrive, then I presume you already know something about God. Otherwise you would not know what to look for, especially as you reject definitions. The point of defining something is not to assert that it is true. Why would you think such a silly thing? But what makes you think you would recognise evidence of God, if you have no idea of what God is, or even supposed to be?