actually is was more of a why you think spirituality doesn't have anything to do with a persons state of being.. you defended by saying that conversation was a waste of your time.. which intoned a lack of knowledge..IOW you don't know..so you avoided the question. we didn't accuse.. getting defensive? well i can verify that you listen.. empathize( you gave me lip for misspelling in my title..so there....:b )you have to..if you didn't you wouldn't be a very good psychologist the question still stands..would you tell a patient that the question they just asked is a waste of your time? took me a couple days to understand this one..(still may not) is the question.. how do you make it so a person picking out another in a line up does not pick a person just because of certain characteristics that are shared between prisoners? distinctive characteristics? beard,tattoos,scars? (physical?) slouch,lean,fidgit,roll eyes? (mannerism?) demand characteristics? what a witness would expect a criminal to have?