From a planet with liquid methane so you only meed a fluid substance to propagate life and maybe I could get more learned with thermodynamics at a quantum level. But I still have proof!
Stoned? Or is this a (rather good) pastiche of Beaconator? Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
I take many near death experience accounts seriously so...... this is evidence that I accept.. .but I could not call it proof.... but it was interesting! http://www.allaboutchristian.com/spirituality/ Christian Andreason, chapter two of his near death experience account....
i met a person once many many years ago who told me they were from a different planet, that they had been born on a different planet other than earth. they appeared 'relatively' sane(some people will say anything to try & get someone to have casual sex with them). some people call that proof but its just a "report" personal "reports" by "people" or "experiencers" is not "proof" but the American media evolution toward making up facts to present news value in a highly competitive click market, have promoted the idea that an "experience" is "proof" its not an "experience" is a "report" of an "event" the "event" then requires its own "proof" which does not consist of "witness reports" "proof" is scientific data that defines things to be non earth originating like a metal that is unable to be identified by professional research labs or genetic material that is clearly identified as being non human and non earth related. the "proof" its self is the conclusive scientific funding of something being directly non earth/human related. for example there is no proof god exists there is also no proof jesus existed any person who is created/born/etc who lives & then dies and no physical body remains to be scientifically tested has no proof of life. human experience tends in a majority toward aspects in modern life that is effectively non provable because the primary function is to "experience" rather than gather "proof" the human evolution obsession with "proof" & one could argue "truth" as a religious dualism was during the middle to later end of AD 1500 to AD 1900 imagine if you had to prove everything you said what type of world would that type of demand on others be like ? nazi party (germany 1920's to 1940's) ? stalins purge russia ? maus red gaurd ? moonies ? wako texas ? hale bob comet cult ? poll pot ? tutsies/hutu's ? the grand inquisition ? (suggested) aztecs blood(adult human, teen & baby) sacrifice culture ? for an example of relative comparatives look at existing animal sacrifices & ritualistic killings for personal opinion/religious belief[killing of one animal & making it suffer for personal entertainment{cock fighting, dog fighting, animal baiting, bull fighting, torture then eating of animals for spiritual belief's}]... (extremely wide spread) ironically the human conceptual morality of non suffering of an animal prior to it being painlessly killed for human needs based subsistence is extremely modern try and comparatively equate that concept of moral position to concepts of xenophobic nationalism toward human co-habitation.