Humanistic Behaviorism

Discussion in 'Human Science' started by Asexperia, Aug 29, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Bells Staff Member

    But you do need hers, which you did not have.

    You posted her actual photo on this site without her consent. That was your one and only warning that you will receive from me about this issue. If you do something like that again, I will ban you. I hope I have made myself clear?
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement

    to hide all adverts.
  3. Aqueous Id flat Earth skeptic Valued Senior Member

    Claiming to be a psychologist, and behaving like a jerk.

    Crunchy Cat, your hunch was right. Gmilam called it: troll.

    I think Sibilia has a slight English deficiency and meant to say "psychotic", not "psychologist".

    Let me see who I can lure into my web by pretending to advocate for humanism. Heh heh heh heh heh.
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement

    to hide all adverts.
  5. Ripley Valued Senior Member

    But the more interesting question now is how did Sibilia acquire her photo in the first place. (This is really turning into a farce. Is 'humor' listed among his morals?)
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement

    to hide all adverts.
  7. Asexperia Registered Senior Member

    Arqueous, Ripley and Trooper, you do not know what is respect.

    You are disrespectful. Don't think your criticisms affect me.

    Arqueous, you are the psychotic.

    Bells, That is requires moderation.

    They can close this thread, but it has 2000 views in 13 days.
  8. Aqueous Id flat Earth skeptic Valued Senior Member

    I didn't see the photo. So far, with the only facts we have, Sibilia is a Dominican homophobe pretending to be a psychologist and seagypsy is the voice of the average poster here, recoiling to Sibilia's remarks.

    If seagypsy was testing Sibilia, she may have posted the pic of someone else, according to how she might guess Sibilia would make a superficial remark about beauty - - which, if I recall, was nowhere in his own list of admirable traits.

    Besides, if he were true to his beliefs, he should have said: "Oh, you look like a Child of God who also takes the Bible literally, and with a lot of personal disgust about people who appear to deviate from the norm. Like those incorrigible homosexuals who simply lack the Word of God to restore them away from their bestial AIDs spreading immorality."

    Of course we don't know if Sibilia is a biological male. Who knows the extent of hoax or not. If so, it's certainly convoluted. It's not very common in the Latin World to identify with a goddess (Cybele) as a biological male.

    Suppose seagypsy is on to Sibilia's little scheme. I vote for her, for you, Ripley (for your healthy skepticism), for Crunchy and Gmilam, for calling a spade a spade, and for everyone else, just for giving Sibila hell, since "he" is obviously asking for it.

    Yeah that's the ticket. Sibilia is a female gendered male pretending to be a homophobe, and seagypsy sent a pic of a woman "he" wants to be, that's all.

    It's OK, Sibilia, you can come out of the closet. Your (thinly veiled) secret is safe with us. No one gives a damn one way or the other. What goes on behind closed doors is of little consequence to the dialogue here.

    . . . of course this could be some freshman class project in sociology . . . who knows?
  9. Aqueous Id flat Earth skeptic Valued Senior Member


    There is no 'R' in Aqueous, Cybele, you mother-goddess, you. This make me think you're lying about being Dominiqueño/a. Agua = aqua. Pretty big slip there, big boy. Or girl.

    Drop the hoax and get real. What's up? Are you going to kick some ass on a thread about humanism?

    Explain to me how that is not psychotic. Or trolling. Which tend to be cross-correlated.

    Do you even know what an index of correlation is, or what it means?

    And why are you behaving like a child in response to criticism? You're supposed to be remaining in that calm center you gave us in the OP. (That idiotic plain-vanilla 1950s social norm that only people in a vegetative state exist in.) Or do the rules of mental health not apply to the Mother Goddess? Is it a domination thing, where you were expecting us to take our medicine? I mean, face it: you're already all over the charts on the borderline personality traits.

    I think you probably picked the wrong place to pull this stunt. If for some reason I've grossly mischaracterized you (odds of winning the next lottery) then maybe you'd care to confess your sins against your God...that's right, I said get down on your knees and beg God for mercy that you won't be thrown into the eternal fires of Hell. You know what I mean. You can't actually be as stupid as your persona here purports to be. After all you're almost bi-lingual.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    Oh, one more thing: trying to leverage your audience hits is OUT THERE. You're no psychologist--more of a used car salesman(/woman). But until you demonstrate a morsel of genuineness, you're simply pitching at windmills.

    Sr/Sra (Don/Dueña) Quixote de Cybele. Yeah, I'm talkin to YOU.
  10. seagypsy Banned Banned

    I didn't see what photo he posted to even know if it was actually my photo. But if he did get it, he probably stole it from my personal blog which is not hard to find. Still he did not have permission to post it here. And yes I find it creepy that he would do such a thing and it wreaks of stalker behavior. One of his balance statements should have been:

    We can admire
    without becoming a creepy stalker.

    At the very least posting the picture was rude and off topic. And he has now used way more than the 2 posts I said I would give him to impress me and in giving him all the time he needed he went way beyond the limits of professionalism and I am convinced that he is not a respected psychologist rather a pseudopsychologist. He just makes it up as he goes and he doesn't even know how to manage simple internet etiquette.

    I have to admit though, I do wonder what picture he posted. And that is NOT an invitation to post it again.

    UPDATE: I just checked my blog stats and it got a hit from Santo Domingo this morning about 8:30 am today. So I am guessing he harvested my picture from that. If he dares post it anywhere else on the internet, I will be contacting his ISP and cut his digital balls off.
  11. Bells Staff Member


    Mod Note


    You went out of your way to search for and look up and then post a photo and comment on the physical appearance of a member here. There are no words, adequate enough, to describe the error of your ways. That you have the nerve to tell someone they are disrespectful after that stunt and the views you have posted in this thread, is laughable. I put it down to the fact that you are new here and may not quite understand the rules of this site. However you now know and if you keep pushing, I will push back and I am not very nice when I push back. I prefer to say this to you now, in the open, rather than respond to your many PM's, so that everyone understands just how I feel about this issue.

    While it would be tempting to allow the members of this site to have at you as you deserve, Human Science, however, is not about letting you dragged over burning coals for your behaviour. So to save you from yourself, in a manner of speaking, I will be closing this thread in case you feel yourself tempted to re-offend.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page