How come there's no clear high quality image or video of a UFO infront of the camera

Discussion in 'Free Thoughts' started by Joaquin, Feb 16, 2015.

  1. Joaquin Sleuth Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    387
    I think aliens have been here but on extremely rare occurrences.


    I just think if we'd be seeing them as often as some people like to make out then we'd eventually get crystal clear images or videos of the spacecrafts in question.

    If there's crystal clear images or videos of UFO's i'd love to see them. I haven't seen one yet trawling through tons of them on youtube.


    The only clear images i've seen of supposed alien spacecraft were the Billy Meier pictures which turned out to be fakes.
     
  2. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Russ_Watters Not a Trump supporter... Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,051
    With the advent of cell phone cameras and now the start of always-on dashboard cameras, if there was anything to see, you'd think we'd be seeing a lot of it, wouldn't you? Even lots and lots of mediocre pictures (since cell phone cameras aren't very good). But, nope, they remain in the margins of very low signal to noise ratio. That's a decent sign that aliens are probably not vising us right now.
     
  4. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Kittamaru Ashes to ashes, dust to dust. Adieu, Sciforums. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,938
    I'm fairly certain we may have been visited by life from outside our planet... but they have not made contact... and lets be fair - if you were an advanced space-faring civilization, what reason would you have to contact the humans of the Sol system? We blow each other up fairly well, but that's really about the extent of our achievements at this point in time, heh
     
  6. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. origin Heading towards oblivion Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,501
    It seems to me the reason there are no clear pictures or videos of aliens is because there are no aliens to photograph.
     
  8. GeoffP Caput gerat lupinum Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    22,087
    It's a good question. There never seems to be a really clear close-up. One could rebut that there were no pictures of coelacanths or other rare but large animals, but that would be against very little time with cameras being available comparatively, and fewer cameras. These days, it seems very doubtful.
     
  9. Magical Realist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    14,077
    People complain if they're too indistinct, calling it a blimp or a meteor, and then they complain if they're too clear, suspecting CGI. Here's one for example. Really clear, but then is it fake?

     
  10. Daecon Kiwi fruit Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,133
    So, in a city as busy and as populated as Paris, exactly one (1) person with a camera-capable phone spotted this UFO?
     
  11. Magical Realist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    14,077
    I don't know how many caught this on cellphone. Do you?
     
  12. Daecon Kiwi fruit Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,133
    Obviously not enough for anyone to notice.
     
  13. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,225
    I know: none whatsoever.
    It's a complete fake.
    There's no such thing as TR-3B.
    There's no vehicle at all that resembles what's in that video (except in the fevered and uninformed imaginations of the gullible/ deluded/ fraudulent).
    And if ANYTHING unidentified had been over Paris it would have been swamped immediately by l’Armée de l'Air (French air force) - there are severe restrictions on what's allowed to overfly that city.
     
  14. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    You " know " how do you " know " ?

    How do you know there is no such craft as the TR-3B ?

    Thats the point , there is No Vehicle that resembles whats in the the video ; hence the problem with its existence

    To your last point wrong :

    What could the French Air Force do about it anyway ?
     
  15. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,225
    Yes.

    Because, among other things, I'm a f*cking expert on aerospace.

    Did you not read the link?

    Since, as you said, THERE IS NO VEHICLE THAT RESEMBLES WHAT'S IN THE VIDEO (i.e. it's a fake) then there is no "problem" with its existence - it doesn't exist.

    Uh, what?
    At the very least they'd have aircraft close to and observing it.
     
  16. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    Well what could they have done ?
     
  17. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,225
    It doesn't matter what they could have "done" (although shooting [at] it comes to mind) - they'd still have aircraft shadowing it.
     
  18. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    How far is the shadow from the UFO ?
     
  19. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,225
    That would depend entirely on what sort of cover they wanted around it.
    But:
    A) there'd be more than one aircraft, and
    B) those aircraft would have been military jets - they'd have to keep moving (so as to stay in the air) and therefore be circling the "UFO".

    (Oh and if there they'd be clearly audible on the soundtrack - there are none).
     
  20. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    Your talking about potential , not what they could actually do and did
     
  21. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,225
    I'm talking about French air defence POLICY.

    What do you mean?
    What makes you think they couldn't do what I stated?
    (They didn't because, like I said, the video is a fake).
     
  22. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    how do you " know " ?
    Because, among other things, I'm a f*cking expert on aerospace.

    You are , are you

    You don't seem so
     
  23. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,225
    Yes.

    And you base this on ... what, exactly?
    Your own ignorance?
     

Share This Page