That warning still stands. Actually no. AIDS is more predominant in the heterosexual community. Sorry to burst that little bubble of yours. But that's the whole thing for you, isn't it? You can't accept that homosexuality is common in nature. More common in the animal kingdom than it is in the human race. Is that lemon too sour for you to suck on? Indeed. And your hairy backside has been wiping the floor many times over in this and other threads. You are one of the minority in this thread who have come out with the stance that homosexuality is somehow not natural. That it is somehow learned behaviour. That has been your whole stance in this thread. You've come out with some BS accusations about homosexuals leading to paedophilia and sexual abuse, or being the result of such crimes. You claim you have done research, and yet have not showed a single whiff of that research or any other research to back your claims. You could try ultra-conservative Christian sites. I think they use the Bible to back up their claims. But unfortunately for you, that won't wash here. But it's alright. You are admitting to being a loser. That's the first big step, I guess. Actually, it might benefit the species. Read the links that I provided previously. It might surprise you. Life comes in all different forms. Not just from a woman's vagina. You probably have more life breeding on your skin. Again, you are the one saying that homosexuals are abnormal and you're calling us bigots? Things aren't always right way up for you, are they? *Sigh* Again, I have provided links of findings of real scientists. You have provided nothing. You are unable to debate this without providing any back-up to your claims. You claim you have done research. Where is said research? Do you have anything concrete to dispute the findings of the scientists? Yes? No? Or do you think that they and the world are lying and against you? Does life come from procreation? Yes. But that does not mean that homosexuality is somehow abnormal or unnatural. Quite the contrary. Homosexuality, like heterosexuality, is a part of nature. That is what you are failing to comprehend. So I will state again, and yes, consider this a warning. Provide proof of your claims. Links to scientific magazines (as one example) to back up your claims. I am sick and tired of having to constantly remind you to provide proof Bish. This is the last time I will do so. If you keep posting unfounded claims as you have been spewing thus far in this thread, I will start deleting such posts from you. I have provided the links and I am expecting you to provide some links to back up your claim. I am not suggesting. I did provide links. And yes, they discuss 'girl on girl' action between animals. You have provided zero proof. Now either put up or shut up. Dude, you're the one saying that as soon as your kids reach puberty, you're going to encourage them to start breeding. Some girls reach puberty at 11 or 12 years of age. You were saying about paedophiles? Many people, be they straight or gay have been sexually abused as children. That is not a precursor to 'making someone gay'. But I will remind you again. This thread is not about paedophilia. It is about homosexuality. Try to stick to the topic. You made the claim petal. I expect you to back your own claim up. So where is your link? Integrity? You have not showed a single bit of it in your time in this forum. Again, the warning will be repeated, either show proof of your claims or I will start deleting your posts for trolling. The solution for you is simple. Since you claim you have the 'data', it shouldn't be too hard for you to link or post it. Is that simple enough for you to understand? You mean like you are saying that homosexuals do not exist in nature when there is proof that it does? But you go one step further. You don't separate from real nature. You just deny it even exists. So by your own words, does that make you an idiot?