Next time, how about just posting the relevant quote - "I made a mistake when I said there were no gas chambers at Auschwitz," - and providing a link to the rest of the material. Although as I had to ask you twice to provide that single quote, perhaps you were over compensating for the delay. As for the article in its entirety, I find it laughable at best, disgusting at worst, that such a biased and one-sided report is allowed to be published. The reporter seems happy with the judge's ruling of David Irving as a "falsifier of history" an "associate of right-wing extremists" and "an active Holocaust denier" in a country where questioning the Holocaust is perfectly legal and left-wing extremists are rarely criticised. Freedom of speech? I think not. Anyone should have the right to call his views into question, but to put him on trial for it? Ridiculous.