Helpful info. for Sciforums betterment.!!!

Discussion in 'SF Open Government' started by cluelusshusbund, May 17, 2014.

  1. cluelusshusbund + Public Dilemma + Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,848
    How about mods list in this thred the curent undesirable Sciforums posters... an also pont out what changes they need to make to become acceptable Sciforums posters.???
     
  2. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Kittamaru Never cruel nor cowardly... Staff Member

    Messages:
    13,877
    I wouldn't suggest something like this... "Name And Shame" tactics rarely have the effect of improving relations
     
  4. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. cluelusshusbund + Public Dilemma + Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,848
    Thanks... a clarification needs to be made... an what i mean by "undesirable" is... posters who are more of a negative than a positive to Scifourms.!!!

    Or had you rather hold on to the undesirable posters... an if so... why.???
     
  6. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Enmos Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    While we're at it..
    we could just ban them when we feel like it. Why name them first? Or are you worried you might be one of them?
     
  8. cluelusshusbund + Public Dilemma + Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,848
    Ive suggested that... but i thank Tiassa said somptin about to much blood woud flow :shrug:

    Ha ha... yeah right

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  9. Enmos Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    :shrug:

    What's the purpose of this thread anyway? I'm not even aware of such a list.

    Do you have a list?
     
  10. cluelusshusbund + Public Dilemma + Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,848
    So undesirable posters will know who they are an what changes they need to make to become acceptable Sciforums posters.!!!

    This way the undesirables woud know who they are an what changes are needed to become acceptable.!!!

    Thats cause it ant happened yet :spank:

    . . . . . . . . :facepalm:
     
  11. Bells Staff Member

    Messages:
    22,711
    There would not be enough hours in a week.

    Refer to above..

    We are all masochists.
     
  12. Enmos Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    So let me get this straight..
    You want the mods to get together to discuss the members, work out amongst themselves which ones should be labled 'undesirable', and then put them on a list in order to display them here?
    Seriously?

    What makes you think we need to name and label people in order to make clear how they are supposed to behave on this website?
    How about this: http://www.sciforums.com/announcement.php?f=30
    Just a suggestion, of course.
     
  13. cluelusshusbund + Public Dilemma + Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,848
    Yes... an to the concerns of Bells... i suggest that you start wit the top 5... an then continue on wit small managable batches.!!!

    The specificity of namin names an exactly what needs to be changed is a fare an just way to put the undesirables on notice... an will be much more effective wit immediate results... insted of jus postin a link to a bunch of rules.!!!
     
  14. Trippy ALEA IACTA EST Staff Member

    Messages:
    10,890
    We could just forceably change their avatars to pink triangles or yellow stars and put them in the user group unerwünscht.
     
  15. river

    Messages:
    11,058
    I would like to think that the discussion on any topic and the quality of the discussion , is more important than any labels

    river
     
  16. Bells Staff Member

    Messages:
    22,711
    Manageable batches? You make it sound like we're making jam...

    And I'll pass thanks. Rather deal with cases on a case by case, need to deal with it now, base thanks.

    You are not children. We aren't putting up a name and shame list and hope for the best. You could only suggest we do something like that if you enjoy conflict.
     
  17. cluelusshusbund + Public Dilemma + Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,848
    Thank you for bein willin to make a bold move... now mayb others will follow.!!!
     
  18. Gremmie "Happiness is a warm gun" Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,593
    :wallbang::wallbang:
    This would be friggin' fantastic... Until, I got a triangle or star. *sigh*
     
    Last edited: May 18, 2014
  19. cluelusshusbund + Public Dilemma + Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,848
    Forcin the undesirables to shape up or be shipped out will instantly improve the quality of discussion.!!!

    Wit the undesirables shaped up or gone... the level of conflict woud be less.!!!

    Are ther any current posters that you thank are more of a negative than a positive for Sciforums.???
     
  20. cluelusshusbund + Public Dilemma + Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,848
    Silly goose... lol... what Trippy is purposin woud only apply to the undesirables.!!!
     
  21. Gremmie "Happiness is a warm gun" Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,593
    True, if there were less "undesirables" , there would be less conflict.

    Mainly, because only those of like mind would be left...

    Dullsville.

    It takes a mix, to make things interesting... Trolls, and all.
     
  22. cluelusshusbund + Public Dilemma + Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,848
    O ther woud still be conflict... but it woud be more mature/civil in nature... ie... less disruption of civil discussion dew to undesirables who consistently brake Sciforuns rules.!!!
     
  23. cluelusshusbund + Public Dilemma + Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,848
    Well... lets see what Mods have to say about that

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     

Share This Page