Help to prove Life originated on Mercury wanted

Discussion in 'Pseudoscience Archive' started by Robittybob1, Nov 11, 2011.

  1. Robittybob1 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    4,199
    http://www.forbes.com/sites/alexknapp/2011/11/10/next-mars-rover-is-prepared-for-launch/
    "The primary mission of the Rover is to examine the Martian surface for signs that portion of it are habitable now by life, or were habitable in the past. NASA made very clear that this isn’t a mission to find life on Mars, but is rather an attempt to determine the best places to look for life."

    well a draw I would say!
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,225
    A draw?
    Certainly.
    It's a draw in that you were wrong with your claim.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Robittybob1 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    4,199
    Get a life!
    "but is rather an attempt to determine the best places to look for life." sounds much the same as looking for life really!
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,225
    Not according to NASA: per their own statement (which you quoted).

     
  8. Robittybob1 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    4,199
    There is not much difference in my opinion.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  9. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,225
    Of course there isn't.
    That's why you replied to my first posting of that quote with the words

    Post #18

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  10. Robittybob1 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    4,199
    Look I've got work to do. But I'll be back!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  11. 420Joey SF's Incontestable Pimp Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,189
    I believe that dyw is incorrect on both counts.
     
  12. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,225
    Belive what you like.
    What does the evidence show?

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  13. Robittybob1 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    4,199
    The evidence so far Earth nil, Mercury 100%, Mars -50,
     
  14. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,225
    That would be patently untrue.
    There has been no evidence presented thus far (and I doubt that that particular argument is what 420Joey was referring to).
     
  15. Robittybob1 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    4,199
    That's right no evidence has been presented so far.
    I am looking for ideas to prove it one way or other.
     
  16. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,225
    And how far do you think you're going to get if you don't present it?
    Or are you expecting to "prove it" on your own?
    (Which, given your predilection for self-delusion, doesn't bode well for reliable results).
     
  17. Robittybob1 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    4,199
    That is just your prejudiced opinion of me from the few ice breaking posts I have made so far. I'm testing the temperature of the forum for depth of actual physic and Earth Science knowledge and haven't felt much as yet.
    Who is the hot-shot on these topics here?
     
  18. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,225
    It happens to be based on the overall sum of your posts so far. Particularly post #30 in this thread.

    Given your lack of knowledge how would you know?

    Well, not you, for a start.
    Either post your "evidence" or shut up.
     
  19. Robittybob1 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    4,199
    Be patient. The Earth has taken 4.5 billions years so far a day or two won't matter.
     
  20. Arioch Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,274
    @Rob --

    You do realize that there's literally no evidence supporting a Panspermia origin of life, right? It's a hypothesis, but not a very likely one and not a very respected one.
     
  21. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,225
    What utter nonsense.
    My hamster created the Earth last Wednesday (and all memories/ evidence otherwise with it).
     
  22. Robittybob1 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    4,199
    Well time will tell. They are only just beginning to explore other planets.
     
  23. Robittybob1 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    4,199
    You'd better not let it bread otherwise we might have multiple universes to look after too.
     

Share This Page