This is what is called 'word play'. Playing with terms like 'nothing' and 'aware of' doesn't compel reality to obey. But just for fun: Note that this mangled logic still doesn't account for the scenario where there is no one being aware. If there's no one to be aware or not be aware, then the issue of whether there can be awareness of nothing does not arise. Note also that 'nothing' is an inadequately defined term. You've only used circular logic. Thus, using a sloppy word to rule events in or out is invalid.