And you won't post any references that support your statement. I believe that's known as an impasse. It's often encountered when ignorant people refuse to consider the possibility that they don't know what they're talking about. This whole stupid sidetrack appears to hinge on the meaning of the phrase "climate stability"; which implies something called "climate instability' with a more or less opposite meaning. Your claim that the last 3 My of climate is unstable is just wrong, ok? The climate has been following a stable pattern for at least that long, ok? "Stable pattern" = "climate stability". Ok? That it follows a pattern that correlates well with general hysteresis isn't really very surprising. Hysteresis is quite a general phenomenon. But you probably know that, being an expert and all.