Gravity

Discussion in 'Alternative Theories' started by Asexperia, Mar 10, 2019.

  1. Asexperia Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,156
    Gravity, like time, is magnitive; time is imperceptible and gravity is undetectable. Gravity exists, is undetectable and measurable. Gravity is such a weak force that it can not be detected with anything; we only see its effects on bodies.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. river

    Messages:
    11,752
    Explain magnitive again .
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. origin In a democracy you deserve the leaders you elect. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,684
    I imagine it is quite a feat to measure something that is undetectable!
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Asexperia Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,156
    Magnitive is the magnitude that we only have indirect evidence of its existence. Magnitive is imperceptible (time) or undetectable (gravity).

    I should have said quantifiable
     
    Last edited: Mar 11, 2019
  8. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    32,166
    Gravity isn't undetectable.

    Throw yourself at the ground and you'll detect it.
     
  9. Asexperia Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,156
    I think that perceiving and detecting are different. We perceive with the senses, devices detect.
     
  10. origin In a democracy you deserve the leaders you elect. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,684
    You can use a bathroom scale to measure gravity. If you want to get a more precise idea of the local gravity you could use a Gravimeter.

    I realize this will have no impact on your preconceived notions, whatever they are, but I thought I would just point out that you have no idea what you are talking about.
     
  11. Asexperia Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,156
    The bathroom scale measures the weight, a manifestation of gravity, but no device has detected the supposed gravitons. That's what I mean.
     
  12. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    32,166
    By the same token, you might say that no device can detect electrical charge. We only see the effects of electrical charge.

    Would you say that electrical charge is "magnitive", too?
     
  13. Asexperia Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,156
    GRAVITY

    1- We can perceive and measure its effects (weight).
    2- The supposed gravitons are not detectable (nature).
    3- It is magnitive.

    ELECTROMAGNETISM

    1- We can perceive and measure its effects (attraction and repulsion).
    2- There is evidence that electric charges exist. They are detectable.
    3- It is not magnitive.
     
    Last edited: Mar 16, 2019 at 4:28 PM
  14. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    32,166
    You're not comparing like and like there.

    You say gravitons (the messenger particles of gravity) are undetectable. But then neither are the virtual photons that carry the electromagnetic force. Nevertheless, we have detected gravitational waves, and obviously we detect light in many ways.

    Also, there is no direct detection of electric charge. It is only detected through its effects on particles and the like that are said to carry charge. The analogue for the gravitational case is, of course, mass. So, while you might say that there is no direct detection of gravity, we certainly see its effects on particles that are said to have mass.

    Given all this, I don't see how electromagnetism can be magnitive while gravity can't. It looks like you're applying your definitions inconsistently.
     
  15. Asexperia Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,156
    No. I said that gravity is magnitive and electromagnetism is not. But if the electric charges are not detectable, then electromagnetism is also magnitive, that is, it exists, undetectable and quantifiable.
     
  16. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    32,166
    Okay, so we have that gravity and time and electromagnetism are magnitive.

    It would seem that the strong and weak nuclear forces must both be magnitive as well. And the Higgs field, while we're at it.

    If all four fundamental forces in nature are magnitive, and those govern all interactions seen in nature, is there anything that isn't magnitive?

    What use is this magnitive concept?
     
  17. Asexperia Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,156
    The physical magnitudes can be magnitive and not magnitive.

    Magnitive: time, the four fundamental forces and the Higggs field.

    Non-magnitive: length, mass, force, speed and acceleration.

    It describes the ineffable quality of some magnitudes.
     
    Last edited: Mar 17, 2019 at 1:40 PM
  18. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    32,166
    You say that magnitive means we have only indirect evidence of its existence.

    What do you mean by indirect evidence, in this context?

    There's only indirect evidence of things like speed and acceleration, arguably.
     
  19. Asexperia Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,156
    We do not see or detect things in themselves, but their effects.
    In the case of particles, they change their behavior when they are observed.
     
    Last edited: Mar 17, 2019 at 8:38 PM

Share This Page