Gravity

Discussion in 'Physics & Math' started by timojin, Nov 5, 2017.

  1. Write4U Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,765
    And with absolute precision.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Write4U Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,765
    TY for the link. I understood most of the narrative, but I am a little stumped by the term Quadrupole.
    In this context does quadrupole fundamentally mean a 360 degree radius, IOW. all points in a variable curved configuration between the four poles, rather than four specific individual points?

    Is it possible to explain this in layman terms?
     
    Last edited: Nov 10, 2017
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Q-reeus Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,533
    Have no idea what a '360 degree radius' means. Anyway, a finite mass quadrupole moment exists whenever there is a departure from spherical symmetry.
    A spherical mass set in oscillatory motion between oblate and prolate spheroid shapes constitutes a mass quadrupole oscillator that will generate gravitational waves.

    Much more typically, two co-orbiting bodies like 'BH's' or NS's generate huge time-varying quadrupole moments, and are the source of those recently deteced GW's.

    Going back to the Earth & tides situation, you will generally have complex shifts in mass distributions going on and higher-order than quadrupole mass moments will be involved.
    Nobody would bother to calculate the likely GW spectrum of such because apart from the enormous calculational complexities, any actual GW's given off will be far too feeble to detect. Ever. And whats more, since we are intimately immersed in the near-field source (Earth), it would be impossible to extricate 1/r GW components from the vastly greater near-field shifts in local g that just might be barely detectable.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Write4U Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,765
    Sorry for my inadequate terminology, but you have put in an understandable narrative for me.....

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    Thank you.
     
  8. Q-reeus Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,533
    Thanks. Where I wrote in #43: "...a finite mass quadrupole moment exists whenever there is a departure from spherical symmetry.", that is not strictly accurate. It's possible to create e.g. an octupole moment without any quadrupole moment, and so on. But that is a highly unnatural situation and in almost all actual cases of interest the quadrupole moment is completely dominant. During LIGO detected merger events, there is additionally 'magnetic moment' analogues to consider owing to presence of spin. But it gets quite intensive to study.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  9. Write4U Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,765
    Of course.....I should have said "360 degree circumference" (regardless of curvature/shape)
     
    Q-reeus likes this.

Share This Page