Gravitational waves from black hole merger

Discussion in 'Astronomy, Exobiology, & Cosmology' started by Plazma Inferno!, Feb 10, 2016.

  1. The God Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,546
    Then answer what is the charge negation time ...that quickie time ? and spin negation time...that normal time ?
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,434
    I don't succumb to bullying demands and false claims by cranks.
    Your questions have all been answered in this thread.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. The God Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,546
    Read : I do not know, because i could not search it by googling......Thats Paddoboy for all.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,434
    I did read.....
    You said.......
    Now google again...If that doesn't help, E-Mail one of the professional experts...easy peasy!
     
  8. The God Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,546
    You are claiming this quickiee and you are not able to support that.....so you are resorting to nonsense...as usual Paddoboyish cop out.
     
  9. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,434
    No, it's actually your nonsense. I have given links supporting that fact...Professor Hamilton for one.
    Let me state it again: A BH can have three properties: Mass, spin, and charge:
    Charge and spin are negated over time. Even mass, according to Hawking Radiation will see a BH evaporate over the lifetime of the Universe.

    If you want to argue against mainstream cosmology, then submit some reference please.
     
  10. The God Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,546
    This is much better...
    You qualified this with some 'quickly' etc...
    Good, you learnt.
     
  11. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,434
    ??? Wow! Such arrogant pedant.
    Let me then rephrase.......charge is negated over time, rather quickly, and spin over larger time frames.......
    But again you omit any reputable links to support any of your unsupported nonsense.
     
  12. The God Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,546
    Can you quantify this 'rather quickly' ?
     
  13. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,434
    Do I need to? Isn't this just another effort by you to attempt to gloss over all that which you have previously denied, and all that you claim but as yet have never been able to verify with suitable reputable links.
    Quite an extensive list in actual fact.
    I mean, you aren't naive enough surely to pretend that we should take any notice of your unsupported claims?

    The "rather quickly" is aptly addressed in a previous post: I'll let you do the searching.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  14. hansda Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,206
    The God,

    It seems you don't have any further reply to my post #406.
     
  15. The God Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,546
    Yes, well thats what he said that this conversion should not be restricted to EMR..

    But I have another question in this Gravitational Radiation thing, I am also searching, Did the baryonic number remain conserved in this loss of 3 Solar Mass ?
     
  16. rpenner Fully Wired Staff Member

    Messages:
    4,833
    The process is time consuming, expensive and leaves at least this Moderator drained of the will to exert even the least bit of human sympathy. But the process continues and justice will come.
     
  17. BdS Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    417
    I haven't read the whole thread, sorry if you been over this already.

    If we are at a greater radial distance with respect to the 2 BH's that merged then the gravitational attract should remain the same to that general direction of space. We have always been attracted to the barycenter of the BH's before they merged with the same attraction after they merged, unless their mass changed.

    There should be no change in our detected gravity before or after the merge from that region.

    what am I missing here?
     
  18. origin Trump is the best argument against a democracy. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,921
    First of all the gravitation detected from the black holes before or after the merger is 0.
     
  19. Schmelzer Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,667
    ????? Black hole have, of course, a non-zero gravitational field.

    There will be no big change before and after (only minor losses because of gravitational radiation), so "is the same" or "has a difference 0" would be ok.
     
  20. origin Trump is the best argument against a democracy. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,921
    His question was, would there be a difference in the amount of gravity we detected here on earth before and after the black holes merged. We of course could not detect any gravity from black holes 1.3 billion miles away.
     
  21. river Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,465
    In what plane would these " gravitational waves manifest " ?
     
  22. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,434
    The same plane that the Lense -Thirring effect and gravity itself manifests itself in I suggest...undulations in spacetime.
    You do know what gravitational waves are?
     
  23. river Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,465
    It's been awhile pad ; update me.
     

Share This Page