gravitational lensing

I have , obviously you have no desire to do so , look again

http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap961215.html

http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap950711.html

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Again, it's simple good old fashion gravitational lensing......Now it's obvious with your anti anti mainstream demenor, you think its something else.
So you show me why its not gravitational evidence, and is definitley something else.
Just one bit of evidence falsifying gravitational lensing will do.

The balls in your court.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

the evidence is in the photos

all four are connected , not separate objects

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

It's an example of gravitational lensing, nothing more., nothing less.

Brought about due to the bending/warping of space/time by an intervening mass, and because light follows geodesics in that space/time.

If you have any other ideas,get it peer reviewed.

 

ah I see

so my explanation stands

 

As suspected and as so often recognised in other anti anti types, delusional.

 

Yes the more advanced always seem this way

That goes with the territory

 

To be anti mainstream for the sake of being anti mainstream, is not actually smart.

 

Gravitational lensing and the general bending/warping of space/time has been validated many times culminating in the data from GP-B.
An Einstein Cross, is but one example of this phenomena.

 

Yet doesn't explain the energy connecting all four objects

 

As others have told you, nothing really to explain.

 

Of course …....

 

So we agree finally it is just an example of gravitational lensing?
Good work!

 

No ...

 

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Which leaves you somewhat out on a limb.

 

We still have no link for the above........

 

river has been trolling this site with bullshit since I signed up.