'God' is Impossible

Discussion in 'General Philosophy' started by SciWriter, May 2, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. SciWriter Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,015
    Then take off the blinders and refute what is there.

    Nice to see you've become an "evidence" guy. Welcome to the other side from Faith.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Yazata Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,414
    You're claiming to have a produced a disproof of 'God's' existence. (Whatever the word 'God' means, which is rarely clear.) But so far, it's basically just been assertions of your own philosophical intuitions. In order to turn that stuff into something like a proof, you are going to have to clearly state what your presuppositions are and then fill in all of the missing logical steps.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. KilljoyKlown Whatever Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,493
    If life doesn't require life what the hell have I been eating all my life?
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. SciWriter Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,015
    You always did hide the vegetables under your plate.

    I'm having a dead duck for dinner.
     
  8. EmptyForceOfChi Banned Banned

    Messages:
    10,848
    Seems like you have turned into a preacher and I have turned into a skeptic. Still waiting on your Evidence though.
     
  9. SciWriter Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,015
    Your refutation of the OP seems to be empty of any forces.
     
  10. EmptyForceOfChi Banned Banned

    Messages:
    10,848
    Not as empty as your pot of evidence.
     
  11. SciWriter Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,015
    Show.

    'Stating' doesn't show.

    Must be tough to show.
     
  12. EmptyForceOfChi Banned Banned

    Messages:
    10,848
    Nice try bucko, your the one with the claim your the one who needs to present evidence. Still waiting.

    I wonder how many Hardcore Atheists are reading this thread and Cringing.
     
  13. SciWriter Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,015
    I've never seen you so quiet to show God.

    Atheists have already checked in here and supported the OP, like Rav, who even extended its compositional support.

    Guess you have zippo specifics, shielding this failure by using generality.

    Believers must be cringing, afraid to come out with 'magic' instead of logic, reason, and thought.
     
  14. EmptyForceOfChi Banned Banned

    Messages:
    10,848

    Have you forgot yourself, or realized what a blunder you have got yourself into with this thread?.

    I would like to remind you that I am not claiming I have proof for god, you are claiming you have proof he does not exist.

    Now Im going to leave you with this to have a long think about what you are suggesting here, you are now clinging to the hope that a theist will march in here claiming to prove god exists so you can fire back with your basic show me proof bit.

    But you got yourself into this one, you get yourself out of it, and I hope you learn from this mistake, don't get so cocky and bold with your claims, especialy when you have no evidence to back them up, now this will be the last bit of attention I give you and your funny little thread.

    You better pray to science dy comes in and hijacks your thread and covers up for your blunders, or that a dumb theist comes in trying to counter prove you with his/her own logical fallacy so you can grasp onto that as a hope to save you from sinking with your ship of un-supported claims.

    Tsk tsk, you should have remained in an agnostic stance, now you have just made a mockery out of yourself with this, and the longer you try to stick to this the worse it wi reflect on you, I suggest you delete this thread and start again, saving yourself from further foolishness.

    *Sigh*
     
  15. SciWriter Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,015
    That did nothing, Chi, showing nothing but generalities, and so it is that the no-God OP is uncontested by you, and that you cannot show God, making for a complete shutout victory. God is impossible, disproved via self-contradiction.

    No contest.
     
  16. SciWriter Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,015
    Chi has no discussion for the discussion thread,
    For the grand and glorious notion of God is dead.
     
  17. wynn ˙ Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    15,058
    I mean:

    If you deem yourself in the position that you need to account for God's existence,
    then you imply that you do not believe in God,
    and more importantly, that you do not even accept the usual definitions of God (which is something to the effect of "First Being").

    Bascially, if you deem yourself in the position that you need to account for God's existence,
    then you imply you are above God.
    Which is in contradiction with the usual definitions of God.

    And if you're not operating out of the usual definitions of God -
    then what point is there to your philosophical inquiry about God?

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  18. wynn ˙ Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    15,058
    You keep saying that.
    Like "La la la I can't hear you!"


    :bugeye:
     
  19. Rav Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,422
    It's quite a bit less complicated than all that Signal. Apart from pointing out that a creator god must be compositional, I was simply examining the veracity of the solution theists present to account for the existence of the universe. Rather than being a solution, it compounds the original philosophical problem.
     
  20. Rav Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,422
    Well, SciWriter is right about one thing. Regardless of whether or not he should have presented his arguments as a "proof", I haven't seen a decent refutation of any of his core assertions.

    If there's really nothing to them, why haven't they been summarily smacked down?
     
  21. wynn ˙ Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    15,058
    How do you smack down a la-la-la-er??
     
  22. wynn ˙ Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    15,058
    It appears you didn't read my post.

    :shrug:
     
  23. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,965
    Er...
    http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=2744812&postcount=24

    But Sci skirted my "refutation" by dismissing it...

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    Although granted, Chi (as usual) just makes assertions as opposed to refutations.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page