Global Warming , proof humans will learn time travel ?

Recent reports of much greater warming over parts of the globe indicate they weren't expected by any predictions.

Invest in a boat company, is my advice.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Im pretty darn sure that sea levels would only rise around 10 feet, 14 at the worst. Considering the fact that what this guy claims is 70 feet means that we are currently breaking the current physics law of energy and matter are neither created nor destroyed just changed from one form to another. Quiet frankly that 56 feet of water had to have just popped out of no where.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

The answer is simple enough. Fossil fuels in solid and liquid form do not cause a greenhouse effect and sit in the ground. After human use, they travel into the atmosphere. Hey I like being warm, but the point is that they were in the ground and now they are in the air. This arguement isnt about anything except pure logic. Ground VS Air.

Now to remedy the situation, there are tax incentives to plant trees and use new technologies and such. The real motivation should be: "Hey, were all gonna die." No one cares about that, but money talks. So, go plant a tree and claim it on your income taxes next year.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Face it Cazzo is not thinking or looking for reality based comments he is just making an ass of himself , and you guys are falling for it.

 

yah, but we fell for it pretty well. it was the whole 70 feet under water that made it unbelievable for me.

 

I don't know, this is coming from one of the pre-eminant websites that preaches "man caused" global warming :
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0209205314.htm

If sea levels went up 70 feet 400,000 years ago, "only" man could have caused it, because "only" man can cause global warming according to the "experts", anything else is a "right-wing" conspiracy to "silence the truth".
Therefore we must conclude that either man will find a way to send all his CO2 back 400,000 years ago to cause global warming back then, or some other "evil" "right-wing" Capitalist alien spieces pumped all it's CO2 into the Earth's atmosphere 400,000 years ago (and other ancient global warming periods).

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

You are partially correct, only mankind can release the volume of greenhouse gasses in such a short amount of time as to cause the unprecedented global warming we see taking place now. Of course, there were times when the climate were warmer, but this was only after a long gradual period of warming. The rate of warming is critical as it pertains to the survival of those species experiencing it.

 

LOL Cazzo is like my wife.
She picks one or two wrds from a whole conversation and is convinced that is all you said.

Cazzo is doing the same thing with the words only man , Cazzo is ignoring the whole rest of what was said as if it never happened.

 

People typically resort to personal insults when they can't win an arguement.

 

there's that short time factor thing....omg

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

And those same processes affecting the climate back then aren't in play today ? Entire nations ready to do who knows what to appease "scientific experts" like Al Gore, because a fraction of 1% of the atmosphere has extra CO2 from man...

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

You know, hundreds and thousands of years ago, some cultural leaders would sacrifice people and do strange rituals when the gods didn't drop enough rain for the crops. They made their sacrifices because their "expert" shamans and druids believed they may have offended the gods....they believed man caused the climate change....

 

http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/ene_oil_con-energy-oil-consumption


do the math

 

This was not an insult. It was a statment of fact.
If you were looking for truth and intelligent conversation you would not have ignored the obvious and common sence that was posted. You completly ignored those that tried to explain it to you so you could push some time travel nonsence.

I am sorry if pointing out the obvious is an insult to you, but that still doesnt make any less true.
Maybe you should take criacisim with a grain of salt. It not always meant as an insult, sometimes it is meant as an explanation as to why you are not listening.

 

And you compound the insult with more insult......

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

You're good at insulting, but not at making constructive arguements dealing with the issue at hand.

 

There are similar processes in play today, but they have been eclipsed by man's activities. You talk about a fraction of a percent as if small numbers don't mean anything. You are mistaken about the science of this. Small percentages matter alot. On another note, debunking Al Gore isn't the same as debunking climate scientists, he doesn't represent the totality of opinion on the matter.

It would be silly to think a man's personal thoughts had an effect on climate, but our actions do indeed.

 

so you just want to argue...
... I get it have a nice night.

 

and how often were the mass die outs due to catastrophic events? fairly often

 

Ha, and these last few weeks have been VERY cold for us. The car park at work being like an ice rink.

But, but, but GLOBAL WARMING!!!!111!!1

 

Actually, now it's referred to as "climate change".
Perhaps all changes of climate are now "because of man" as well..

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Does this mean man will find a way to time travel and affect ALL climate in Earth's past ???

 

If you think about it from a global scale, the time from say, the industrial revolution (i.e. when the shit hit the atmopshere) to the time when we looked around and said, 'Oops!' is actually quite quick. Let's call it 80 years of automobiles chocking the air, severe rainforest depletion etc. etc. etc. and we are already beginning to slow the acceleration.
Provided we keep the current patch-work pace up, reparations to the issues we currently see could be controlled withing 50 years.
Note: I say the issues "we currently see" because I'm sure our solutions will generate other issues.
The two biggest issues to the planet are obviously, commercialism and convenience. Since we (N.Amer.) are already starting to buy products that do that same job and are enviro-friendly (as far as we know, so far), I'd say we're doing pretty good at addressing these issues.
If the planet continues to hurt, it could be something else. (i.e. I hear termites produce more methane gasses than cows do, by a great margin.)