This doesn't address what I said about Betamax's blunder. Here's where we discussed this. http://www.politicalforum.com/index...e-spacewalk-was-faked.578673/#post-1072488086 His position is that the physical size of the bubble increases. He doesn't say that it looks bigger as it's getting closer to the camera. He later changed his position. He changed his position because he realized he'd made a big blunder. First he said it was a piece of debris. Then he said that that the object couldn't be a bubble because a bubble's size wouldn't change that much in that short distance. He clearly meant physical size. Then, when I pointed out that a piece of debris wouldn't change in physical size, he changed his story. This is clear to anyone who takes the time to read the discussion. Your tactic of misrepresenting what was said is only going to work on some of the viewers who don't take the time to read the discussion.