Genetic modification: fear it! fear it like THE BOMB!

Discussion in 'Biology & Genetics' started by ElectricFetus, Jun 25, 2003.

  1. Konek Lazy user Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    140
    Hi everyone. I'm a newbie here. I do feel that more tests should be carried out on GM foods before actually letting them out in the market. (I know the FDA requires tests, but they are not very thorough). And of course, more supervision is required to prevent cross-contamination with other crops.

    But what really bothers me is Monsanto's monopoly over GM foods. In Europe, for example, they have a patent over all forms of genetically engineered soybean varieties, regardless of the genes used or the transformation technique employed. During nine years the industry has tried to have that patent revoked without any success.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. ElectricFetus Sanity going, going, gone Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,523
    Welcome Konek,

    My problem is that people see GM in general as bad or dangers, this is simply not true! Some GM products do have legitimate problems, but not all GM products. GM products should be treated and tested on a individual level, there should not be some general label on all foods saying it contains GM products that just stupid and promotes this generalization fallacy.

    But ya, Monsanto lock on the industry is a problem.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Konek Lazy user Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    140
    I guess it would all depend on what trait they are introducing and why they are introducing it. People are scared of the soybeans because they are resistant to pesticides, and that resistance might end up in some other unwanted plant... very unlikely, but possible. Others worry about allergy issues when introducing foreing genes.

    But let's say you're introducing genes from a commonly eaten crop into another... still the same DNA you've been eating all along, only now you find it in a different plant that you've still been eating all along. I have no problem with that.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. 2inquisitive The Devil is in the details Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,181
    I think there are some misconceptions here. I am not a chemist
    nor a farmer, but I will try to give some insights from a layman's
    perspective. As I have stated before, my closest friend is a
    farmer, from generations of farmers. He and his family own
    several thousand acres of land, acquired over generations.
    First of all, Roundup is a herbicide, not a pesticide. Pesticides
    kill insects, herbicides kill plant life. Herbicides are necessary
    to keep grass and weeds from overtaking the crops. I am not
    aware of any pesticides that are used on soybeans. I was
    visiting my friend yesterday and he was pointing out a field
    of beans that had been sprayed with a herbicide recently. The
    soybeans and the grasses were both about 6 to 8 inches in
    height. The soybeans were green, the grass was turning
    yellow. The herbicide was blocking photosynthesis in the grass
    causing it to slowly die, much as laying a sheet of plywood on
    your lawn will cause the grass to die if left in one spot. The
    Roundup Ready soybeans have a protein introduced into them
    to keep the herbicide from having a serious effect on them. The
    long chemical name of the protein can sound intimidating to the
    non-chemist, but it is derived from a substance found in the soil
    and is simular to baker's yeast, among other things, not toxic to
    humans. Roundup heribicide has been around for many years,
    its 25 year patent already expired. There are less costly generic
    copies on the market now. It has been extensively tested over
    many years and is known to be safe. Most of the time the soybeans are only sprayed with herbicide one time, early in
    their growth period. Sometimes excessive rainfall can make a
    second spraying necessary. It is not done unless necessary
    because it cost MONEY each time. After the soybeans are larger,
    they effectively block most grasses from becoming a problem
    because the grass doesn't grow well in the shade. (Remember
    photosynthesis?)
    OK, now a problem effecting small farmers like my friend. A lot
    soybeans are now imported, many from South America. In the
    U.S., farmers have to buy seeds from Monsanto to plant because
    of the patent laws. Monsanto charges about $22.50 for each
    50lb bag of soybeans which plants about one acre of land. He
    sold his beans for about $5.32 per bushel (about 60lbs) this
    past year. He cannot save part of the beans for planting the
    next year because of the patent laws. The farmers in South
    America are immune from U.S. patent lawsuits. They replant
    seeds they saved and it costs them much less to plant their
    crops. They also are blessed with a deeper and better quality
    topsoil than my friend has and often don't have to use the
    expensive nitrogen-based fertilizer that he has to. In other
    words, it costs them much less to grow their crops. They can
    sell for less and still make a good profit. My friend hasn't been
    making money on his soybeans the last 2 or 3 years. He has
    already stopped growing some other crops because he was
    losing money on them. Many of his fields are now planted with
    grasses for pastures. His cattle business has been profitable.
    He hates to stop growing crops because that is how he was
    raised, as a farmer. He is not a "country hick" as some have
    sterotyped farmers. His equipment costs hundreds of thousands
    of dollars and includes many electronics and GPS. My point?
    Could we (the U.S.) become as dependent on foreign suppliers
    for our food and agricultural products as we are now on our oil?
     
  8. justiceusa Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    908
    2 inquisitive

    "could we (the US that is) become as dependant on foreign suppliers for our food and agricultural products as we are for our oil." ?
    ___________________________________________________

    Gees thats a quantaum leap from anthing that is related to fact.


    Yes pesticides, are, and have the last 60 years, been sprayed on soybeans.

    http://216.27.49.98/pg07_WildlifeSpeciesCon/pg7f2b8.htm

    I repeat my greatest concerns with GM is to jump in with both feet without having or planning for any form of backup should anything go unexpectedly drastically wrong.

    The human body is a curious thing. Things may suddenly go awry, or it may take some time.

    For instance the medical profession had been using synthetic latex gloves for nearly half a century, when a few years back medical workers and a few patients started having an allergy problem. After a few more years had passed the problem was so prevalent among health care workers that latex had to be replaced with forms of polyethelyne. Why?? beats me, thats just the way the human body is.

    And the same type of situation could be triggered by any sudden deviation from the chemical structure of any of the foods that we have eaten, primarily unchanged, for hundreds of years.
     
  9. ElectricFetus Sanity going, going, gone Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,523
    justiceusa,

    I advice you don't live in a country with a exotic diet, it may kill you. or perhapes this little number:

     
  10. justiceusa Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    908
    WCF

    The quote is exactly what I am talking about , any change, be it traditional or genetic has the possiblity of causing problems.

    Those who live in countries with exotic diets have always eaten those exotic diets. Those who go there infrequently are the ones who experience problems.
     
  11. ElectricFetus Sanity going, going, gone Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,523
    And my point is GM or not changes are always being made so why focus on GM as if it was some new kind of evil? Also human digestion is effected by how your digestive track has gotten use to your diet and not evolutionary effects because the diet just 2 generations ago was already very different from what it is today (in the USofA that is).
     
    Last edited: Jul 1, 2003
  12. justiceusa Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    908
    WCF

    Your probably right for the most part, but I would rather err on the side of caution. Its the old geeser in me.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  13. Konek Lazy user Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    140


    My mistake, sorry.

    Not quite. Actually, anyone is free to save seeds from the previous crop and plant them, provided the seeds are not genetically modified. Of course, the problem in other countries is that laws are not always properly enforced.

    Those in the agricultural business in the US keep buying GM soybeans because their cost analysis proves that it's still cheaper to buy the GM crops and reduce herbicide costs.

    As for becoming dependent on foreign suppliers for food.... that will not happen. The U.S. has subsidies that allow farmers to keep their costs competitive. You'd be surprised to learn that in many third world countries production costs are much higher than here simply because they don't use modern technology.
     
  14. ElectricFetus Sanity going, going, gone Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,523
    I also believe in universal testing.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  15. dinokg Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    306
    Yup. As long as a genetically modified product is tested and is proven not to be dangerous it should be usable.

    After a small testing then large testing of the product.

    Also you need to check for weird allerges that only a few people have.

    Don't want someone who is allergic to peanuts to get sick from a peanut/corn hybrid.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  16. ElectricFetus Sanity going, going, gone Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,523
    As well as testing of new hybridized and selectively breed products with traits that have possible human health or environmental concerns.
     
  17. 2inquisitive The Devil is in the details Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,181
    Konek, I apologize. Herbicides and INSECTICIDES are both
    included in the catagory pesticides. In an Iowa State study
    on the effects of pesticides on the FARMER and his family,
    (a study of 25 farm families who grew both corn and soybeans)
    it was found all corn and soybeans were sprayed with herbicides,
    all corn was sprayed with insecticides and no soybeans were
    sprayed with insecticides. Insecticides are only sprayed on
    soybeans if there is a very serious insect infestation that could
    cause a threat to the crop. Some insecticides on the market
    are to protect soybeans in storage for replanting from insect
    infestation. South American farmers ARE using Roundup Ready
    soybeans and saving some of the beans for replanting, hence
    the savings.
    justiceusa, I found no estimate of the percentage of imported
    foods we now consume, but I did find the following in the new
    Bioterrorism Act just passed.
    Nearly 20% of all imports into the U.S. are food and food products. Congress passed the Bioterrorism Act as part of its ongoing effort to combat terrorism - in this instance, by reducing the ability of international terrorists to carry out terrorist attacks in the U.S. by contaminating imported foods. The Act requires that FDA receive prior notice before food is imported or offered for import into the United States. The advance notice of import shipments will allow FDA and CBP to target import inspections more effectively and help protect the nation's food supply against terrorist acts and other public health emergencies.
    20% of ALL imports seems like a lot of foods are already imported.
     
  18. dinokg Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    306
    Another thing to watch out for is "Auto Die Crops".
    These were made so after one season of growing normally a crop will have infertile seeds and be unable to reproduce more of the plant.

    This was done to the plant seeds so that after one season a farmer has to by new seeds instead of reuseing the seeds from the previous season.

    This company did this just to make a little extra money.

    But besides costing the farmers more money this also brings up a problem.

    What if this got into the ecosystem?

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  19. Ectropic Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    195
    Yeah, because then all those nasty BioEngineered plants would die off instead of spreading everywhere? I don't see the point. Do you seem then as cross breeding with plants and killing them all in a year? It seems like a good way to control it to me. A plant with a single season life cycle can't take over the world unless that is one ass kicking season.
     
  20. dinokg Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    306
    These plants are dangerous when they cross pollenate which could cause limited local extintions of closely related species.
    It theres to many local extintints then a species would go extinct.

    But on the bright side the magazine I got this info from says this type of genetically modified crop was canceled.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  21. ElectricFetus Sanity going, going, gone Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,523
    One way around that is to prevent them from being able to produce (much) pollen, making artificial insemination the only viable means for them to reproduce.
     
  22. dinokg Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    306
    They are already working on making GM plants make less pollen and have it travel not as far.

    The problem is its not a hundred percent accurate.

    This is because its against the laws of nature for something to not be able to reproduce.

    Its also not a good evolutionary adaption.

    Creature can reproduce its species stays alive.

    Creature can not reproduce species goes KABOOM!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  23. ElectricFetus Sanity going, going, gone Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,523
    These are not natural animals and do not abide by natural laws. Most domestic plants and animals could not survive on there own in nature, yet they are still alive because a farm is not nature.
     

Share This Page