Fossils point to oldest life on Earth

Discussion in 'Earth Science' started by MrPink, Jun 7, 2006.

  1. MrPink Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    34
    It's strange because this representation is not what I pictured adam or eve to look like?



    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060607/ap_on_sc/oldest_life_1

    By SETH BORENSTEIN, AP Science Writer 2 hours, 57 minutes ago

    WASHINGTON - Odd-shaped mounds of dirt in Australia turn out to be fossils of the oldest life on Earth, created by billions of microbes more than 3 billion years ago, scientists say in a new report.

    And these mounds are exactly the type of life astrobiologists are looking for on Mars and elsewhere.

    A study published Thursday in the journal Nature gives the strongest evidence yet that the mounds dotting a large swath of western Australia are Earth's oldest fossils. The theory is that these are not merely dirt piles that formed randomly into odd shapes, but that ancient microbes burrowed in and built them.

    "This is the pointy end of the fossil record; this is the first really compelling record," said study lead author Abigail Allwood, a researcher at the Australian Centre for Astrobiology. "It's an ancestor of life. If you think that all life arose on this one planet, perhaps this is where it started."

    The mounds come in different shapes — like egg cartons, swirls of frosting on cupcakes or waves on the ocean. They are called stromatolites and have been studied for a long time, but the big question has been if they were once teeming with life.

    Allwood's research, which included examining thousands of the mounds and grouping them into seven subtypes, is the most comprehensive and compelling yet to say the answer is yes, according to a top expert not on her team.

    "It is the best bet for the best evidence of the oldest life on Earth," said Bruce Runnegar, director of the
    NASA Astrobiology Institute in Moffett Field, Calif. "These are too complicated to be attributed to non-biological processes — but we don't know that for a fact."

    Allwood said her study made the case for life solidly by looking at how the stromatolites fit with the rock formations around them, with each other, and what would have been happening on Earth at that time. One of the clinchers was putting them in seven repeating subtypes, which indicates they weren't random.

    "It's just the sheer abundance of material and to be able to put it all in context," Allwood said.

    Runnegar who has examined the mounds in western Australian several times said the first time he saw them — some of which jut out from hills at eye-level — he experienced an otherworldly feeling.

    In a similar situation 10 years ago, scientists at NASA claimed they found evidence of fossilized microbial life in a Martian meteorite. Those claims have been sharply disputed.

    One of the chief skeptics of the Martian meteorite claims, Ralph Harvey, a geology professor at Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, said he is far more inclined to believe that the Australian mounds were once alive.

    The key difference is that on Mars, scientists were looking for evidence of life on "a potentially dead planet" and the requirement for proof is extraordinary, Harvey said. Less evidence, he said is needed for Allwood's claims because "we already know that life has been on Earth for a very, very long time; all we're trying to do is push it further back."
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Ophiolite Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,232
    I found it peculiar that so much doubt was cast on the thought that stromatolites were the product of life. This has been close to a given for many decades. Yes, it is not absolutely proven, but very little is within science. I cannot recall a single publication denying that they are fossils, and many that declare they are. Odd.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Avatar smoking revolver Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,083
    It's not the oldest, there is evidence in Greenland rocks that points to a quite plentiful life 3.75 billion years ago.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Ophiolite Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,232
    The Greenland evidence is purely based upon geochemical analysis. The interpretation of this analysis is disputed.
     
  8. valich Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,501
    Earth formed 4.6 bya.
    Moon 4.5 bya.
    Oldest volcanic rock: 4.4 bya.
    Sedimentary rocks: 3.85 bya. (sedimentary rocks imply the presence of water)
    Greenland fossils: 3.85 bya. (banded iron formations resulting from oxygen released by photosynthetic organisms, possibly from plankton but this is still being debated)
    West Australian fossils: 3.5 bya (stromalites: evidence of cyanobacteria)

    "May 24, 2002 issue of Science, Fedo and Whitehouse challenge the interpretation that a quartz-pyroxene rock containing carbon-13-depleted graphite from the island of Akilia, Southwest Greenland is a banded iron formation (BIF). This finding would deny the claim that this formation represents the oldest fossils (>3.85 bya) of life on Earth. This is after the biological origin for morphological fossils from the ~3.465 bya Apex chert in Western Australia, long thought to represent the oldest physical evidence for life on Earth, has been recently questioned. Taken together, these two recent challenges are a set back that distinct shapes and organic chemical signatures provide adequate evidence of biomarkers of fossils of the oldest life on Earth. With these challenges, the remaining best evidence for the earliest life on Earth is carbon-13-depleted graphite particles in deep-sea clastic sedimentary rocks from the Isua greenstone in Greenland. These sediments, dating to 3.7 to 3.8 bya, correspond to the end of the late heavy asteroid bombardment, when Earth's surface conditions were more stable and retention of a life-sustaining hydrosphere was favored.
    http://www.fossilmuseum.net/UD desktop/UD_destop_postings/evolution/Oldest_Fossils.htm
     
  9. valich Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,501

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!


    Banded Iron Formation with alternating bands of magnetite and hematite. These a presumably produced by hydrothermally derived Fe2+ and oxygen released by photosynthetic organisms to form cyclic layers of insoluble iron oxides.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!


    3.5 bya stromalite fossil from Western Australia
    Source: http://www.emc.maricopa.edu/faculty/farabee/BIOBK/BioBookPaleo2.html

    The Steps of Evolution: Origin of the Universe ~15 bya > condensation and accretion of chemicals > planetissimals > protoplanets > planets (molten earth) > reducing atmosphere > primordial earth with organic chemicals (N2, H2O, CO2, CO, CH4, NH3) > amino acids + heat > nucleic acids > protocells (coacervates or microsphericals) > progenotes (RNA world = primitive replicating system) > cenancestors (DNA world) > prokaryotes > eukaryotes.

    ~4 bya: "In 2000 evidence in sedimentary rocks off of Greenland indicated chemical evidence of early life from about this time. (SFC, 12/1/00, p.A21)" http://timelines.ws/0000BB_416MIL.HTML
    note: This "Timelines of History" website has received great reviews but I have no idea what SFC stand for. Anyone know?
     

Share This Page