Flux Capacitor Circuit Diagram

Discussion in 'Architecture & Engineering' started by Layman, Nov 25, 2014.

  1. Layman Totally Internally Reflected Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,001
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Layman Totally Internally Reflected Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,001
    I managed to get it to go up to 2MV, by making a slight modification to the storage capacitor.

    http://www.falstad.com/circuit/#$ 1 5.0E-6 13.097415321081861 48 10.0 42 t 128 128 192 128 0 1 -4.75021549132696 0.7358645585065853 100.0 t 128 224 192 224 0 -1 13.811847692558564 -0.7020722576078913 100.0 w 192 144 192 176 0 w 192 176 192 208 0 w 192 240 192 288 0 r 128 224 128 288 0 220.0 r 128 128 128 64 0 220.0 d 128 176 128 224 1 0.805904783 R 128 176 64 176 0 1 40.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 w 128 288 192 288 0 w 128 64 192 64 0 w 192 64 192 112 0 R 128 64 128 16 0 0 40.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 R 128 288 128 336 0 0 40.0 -10.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 d 128 128 128 176 1 0.805904783 w 192 176 272 176 0 r 272 176 272 288 0 10.0 g 272 288 272 320 0 c 272 176 336 176 0 1.4999999999999999E-5 -0.15348382824113393 t 368 192 336 192 0 1 0.6545084862847439 0.6532249976559319 100.0 a 432 112 432 192 0 1000000.0 0.0 1000000.0 w 368 192 432 192 0 r 336 112 416 112 0 1000.0 w 336 208 336 256 0 174 432 256 528 256 0 50.0 0.5 Resistance r 528 256 608 256 0 1000.0 w 448 112 480 112 0 w 480 112 480 240 0 w 416 48 608 48 0 w 608 48 608 256 0 l 336 320 336 368 0 1.0 0.010547384438952492 c 336 368 336 416 0 1.4999999999999999E-5 0.6820866868430973 g 336 416 336 432 0 w 432 416 368 416 0 w 432 320 368 320 0 w 480 368 512 368 0 d 432 416 480 368 1 0.805904783 d 384 368 432 416 1 0.805904783 d 432 320 480 368 1 0.805904783 d 384 368 432 320 1 0.805904783 w 368 320 368 368 0 w 368 416 368 368 0 w 368 368 336 368 0 w 608 256 608 288 0 w 336 256 336 288 0 w 336 288 336 320 0 w 384 368 384 432 0 w 384 432 512 432 0 c 512 368 512 432 0 0.001 0.008025712600491147 w 512 368 560 368 0 w 512 432 560 432 0 g 560 432 592 432 0 O 560 368 608 368 0 c 336 256 384 256 0 1.4999999999999999E-5 8.241863429034879E-4 r 384 256 432 256 0 1000.0 r 608 288 512 288 0 1000.0 c 512 288 336 288 0 1.4999999999999999E-5 8.112152841741604E-4 c 336 112 336 176 0 1.4999999999999999E-5 0.0010129710593940189 z 416 48 416 112 1 0.805904783 1000.0 o 52 64 0 34 0.009765625 9.765625E-5 0 -1

    That is still 10k off into getting into the 21.1 Gigawatt range

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. leopold Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    17,455
    i surmised you managed to simulate it.
    most (well, some) circuits can go from simulation to breadboard.
    while others require special construction technics.
    low noise amps, high amplification factors, and high voltage circuits require special technics to get them to operate correctly.

    carry on layman, an inquisitive mind is the first step to real knowledge
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Layman Totally Internally Reflected Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,001
    Thanks, I have toyed around with this idea in the past. I just found out about the circuit simulator, and I was shocked that I got it to operate like I thought it could in the simulation. I noticed that I have the maximum output of the op-amp set to 1MV. Then the maximum voltage it could create out of the voltage doubler would then be 2MV. Then when I try to set the op-amp to a higher maximum voltage the simulator really starts to lag out in it's calculations.
     
  8. Layman Totally Internally Reflected Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,001
    Basically, all I did was protect the AC source from a resonance circuit, and then I put a voltage regulator on it to prevent it from resonating normally. Then I put a ac to dc converter on it that acts like a doubler and storage capacitor. The operation of the flux capacitor would be where these three basic circuits would meet where the resonance is just being managed.
     
    Last edited: Nov 25, 2014
  9. leopold Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    17,455
    what kind of simulator are you using?
    for example, do you know what kind of DC the simulator generates when you tell it the supply is 12V DC?
    this is important to know.
    is it a flat horizontal line?
    this is something that you will hardly ever get in the real world.
    if you are actually interested in this stuff then you need a better simulator and you need a little background on the various electronic components and how and why they operate the way they do.

    another example would be the 1 MV you mentioned earlier.
    have any idea the isolation protocols needed to build such a circuit?
     
  10. Layman Totally Internally Reflected Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,001
    I was just using the java circuit simulator on the link I provided that shows the circuit I made. You have to right click at the top of the page to run the ap. I set up my internet to allow it to run when I bring up the page. May have to download the java simulator.
     
  11. Layman Totally Internally Reflected Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,001
    The positive and negative is just needed to operate the improved push pull follower. I started with it, because I noticed that AC tied to a resonator will change the AC of the circuit. Then the improved push pull follower allows for a constant AC signal to be applied that won't be altered by the circuit connected to it's output.
     
    Last edited: Nov 25, 2014
  12. Layman Totally Internally Reflected Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,001
    Then the resonator could have constructive and destructive interference, so I added the voltage regulator to reduce the destructive interference. A normal resonator would create a signal that is a pulse like wave that is so rapid that the pulses make the shape of a signal wave. Then the voltage regulator eliminates that pulse, so the electrons would be able to flow back and forth at the same rate.
     
  13. Layman Totally Internally Reflected Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,001
    Is this just not troll-able type of material or what? You guys are starting to scare me. Should I start filing missing person reports or what?
     
  14. origin Trump is the best argument against a democracy. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,924
    Actually some things are just so over the top stupid that they are not even worthy of comment.
     
    Russ_Watters and Read-Only like this.
  15. sideshowbob Sorry, wrong number. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,961
    I think it's worthwhile commenting that Back to the Future came out so long ago that people didn't know how to pronounce "giga".
     
  16. Kittamaru Now nearly 40 pounds lighter. Staff Member

    Messages:
    13,224
    I... should not be looking at this at nearly one in the morning... my brain can't process this... nor can it recall my electrical engineering courses enough at this time to understand what I am looking at XD
     
  17. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,757
    Nope. Going to have to do better than that.
     
  18. Layman Totally Internally Reflected Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,001
    In that case, I have improved on the design to get it to run more effectively with output voltage of the op-amp. I was trying to change the values of the capacitors in the voltage regulator when the simulator seemed to stop allowing me to select the export link to copy it. I thought lowering the values of the regulator would increase the performance, but some changes to the values result in no convergence, like a lot of minor changes that could be made to the circuit.

    http://www.falstad.com/circuit/#$ 1...6 0 o 28 64 0 34 8.388608E7 9.765625E-5 0 -1
     
  19. Layman Totally Internally Reflected Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,001
    I think the joining of the inductor to the circuits works a lot like a voltage doubler, but instead of just adding current flow from one direction and another it just compounds current flow in both directions an indefinite number of times. Then instead of just having current flow in one direction or the other at two different times, it ends up allowing for current to flow in both directions multiple times at once. An inductor would reflect the electrons. Normally, it would achieve resonance, but in resonance the electrons would just tend to vibrate, since the voltage level changes very rapidly. Remember voltage level changing from positive to negative is caused by the change in direction of current flow. Then the voltage regulator would change this vibration to current flow in both directions at multiple times at once.

    Then I found I ran into a problem where the voltage becomes so high across the capacitors that it creates a large negative voltage on the other side of the capacitor going to ground and the push/pull circuit. Then this negative voltage cannot be shorted to ground, because the capacitor is pulling negative voltage from ground. Then I am not sure how to get a negative voltage to ground when a capacitor is creating it from ground.
     
  20. Layman Totally Internally Reflected Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,001
    The app decided to let me change the capacitance of the capacitors in the voltage regulator. By lowering them, the op-amp would feel changes in voltage sooner allowing to respond more rapidly, because a capacitor with lower values would take less time to charge up. By decreasing the capacitance by a third I got more than double the output voltages to about 108.73MV. Note, the primary inductor has about 178.44GW at that time. Doesn't seem like Dr. Brown would have needed the plutonium for this type of set up. BTW, I just found out it was only 1.21GW. You guys must be really slacking off.

    http://www.falstad.com/circuit/#$ 1... 0 o 28 64 0 34 1.6777216E8 9.765625E-5 0 -1
     
  21. Layman Totally Internally Reflected Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,001
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DeLorean_time_machine

    "The power required is pronounced in the film as one point twenty-one "jigowatts".[1] While the closed-captioning in home video versions spells the word as it appears in the script, jigowatt,[4] the actual spelling matches the standard prefix and the term for power of "one billion watts": gigawatt. Though obscure, the "j" sound at the beginning of the SI prefix giga- is an acceptable pronunciation for "gigawatt."[5][6] In the DVD commentary for Back to the Future, Bob Gale states that he had thought it was pronounced this way because this was how a scientific advisor that he had for the film pronounced it.[7]"

    Now I am not even sure how your supposed to pronounce gigawatt. It seemed like it sounded like it was said with a "g" when I heard it.
     
  22. leopold Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    17,455
    i wouldn't necessarily call it stupid, but it does seem layman is, well, inexperienced.

    a word of caution layman, anything over 40 volts or so can ruin your day.
     
  23. Layman Totally Internally Reflected Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,001
    So I take it you have experience in developing power systems for Delorean time machines? Any pointers you could give me?

    I have been working on trying to invent something like this, but it does seem disturbing on how much power something like this could put out. That would make it very dangerous to develop. Frankly, I cannot think of anything that it could be used for, and free energy devices are not patent-able in the U.S. I was thinking about maybe making something up that would make it sound like it was not free energy. I thought maybe you guys could help me in that area. I was thinking about saying it is something more along the lines of just an intensifier, and there is no such thing as an intensifier circuit that has been invented yet.
     

Share This Page