The verdict and reaction to the verdict within Ferguson Mo, is a textbook case of the democratic playbook based on feminism/liberalism. As an analogy, say a wife asks her husband if she looked fat in her new dress? She does not what a logical analysis or even the truth, if it does not make her feel good. What she wants is a reaction that makes her feel good, even if her husband has to lie. This husband and wife template is the basis for liberalism and is the dynamics working in Ferguson. The protestors already had the answer they wanted in hear, with a logical analysis of the hard data not welcome, unless it led to them getting what they wanted to hear. In this Grand Jury Case, the Jury did not cave in to the anticipated emotional blackmail, lying to appease feelings. So many bad liberal policies have successfully used this template. The post Grand Jury decision temper tantrum, in Ferguson, led by democratic party liberal groups, was set up months in advance, to apply leverage, since not appeasing could start a trend in terms of logical truth winning over appeasement. This trend could reverse many irrational social policies that have been accepted based on appeasement. If look at the riot reaction within Ferguson, that goes beyond the basic emotional manipulation of whether I look fat in my dress. The violence and looting reaction shows another aspect of liberalism, connected to the democratic party playbook. That playbook chapter polarizes culture into black and white, male and female, rich and poor, haves and have nots, etc. If you notice, the polarization connected to black and white, sort of spilled over and merged into rich (business) and poor, justifying the looting temper tantrum. I think the businesses involved should sue the democratic party for programming their base to react blindly to merged stereo types. Nothing may happen in such a suit, but it will put a spot light on preventable violence fanned by Democratic party text book manipulation.