Explain this

Discussion in 'SF Open Government' started by zarlok, Mar 2, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. zarlok Banned Banned

    Messages:
    116
  2. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Asguard Kiss my dark side Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    23,049
    If this comes across as bitchy i really dont care, im at uni and shouldnt have to deal with this on MY time but anyway

    Zarlok its really simple, If you claim that Hillery is really a pink unicorn you need to PROVE that, if you want to say obama is black you dont (why you would want to i dont know)

    Tiassa, provided a source to his argument
    So did Ashura

    In fact the only one who hasnt is the one who is screaming he is following the rull

    A futher note, just because i HAVENT cleaned up that thread doesnt mean i WONT. As i said im busy right now
     
  4. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. zarlok Banned Banned

    Messages:
    116
    Repeating something that is not true does not make it true. Doesn't matter how many times,. Really, it doesn't. No one ever showed any evidence whatsoever that Mccain lied. Not an ounce of proof. I don't care how bitchy or busy you are. If you don't want to be a moderate, leave your hammer and sickle at the door.
     
  6. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Asguard Kiss my dark side Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    23,049
    look its really symple. If you think they are lies fair enough the ball is in YOUR court. PROVE THEM WRONG. This is a debate forum, so spend some time, go through the internet and find a news artical that shows he DIDNT lie about whatever the hell it was they said he did
     
  8. ashura the Old Right Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,611
    That's similar to asking for proof of Clinton lying once the Lewinsky facts broke through while implying that Clinton truly did forget or had amnesia or anything along those lines. Without a self-implicating statement from Clinton, how would you prove such a thing?
     
  9. zarlok Banned Banned

    Messages:
    116
    The onus is on me to prove mccain is NOT a liar? WHAT? You can't even prove a god damn negative statement, did they not teach you that in grade school? Who the fuck wrote this again:

     
  10. Asguard Kiss my dark side Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    23,049
    you cant back up your agument, they can

    You lose, they win stop crying to mummy
     
  11. zarlok Banned Banned

    Messages:
    116
    Unfucking real. You aren't even in college. You are in grade school, because it's obvious you have next to zero reading comprehension. They can't prove shit and I have nothing to prove. This place is a joke.
     
  12. ashura the Old Right Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,611
    Zarlok, all that rule asks for is a source to back up your argument. The source doesn't have to explicitly state your point, but simply back up the point you're trying to make. A part that makes up the sum and not the sum itself. I provided that. This is why your use of that rule as a reason to warn me is silly. Admittedly, I don't think you have anything to prove. I provided my case and evidence, and it's up to you to debate me on them. As I already stated in that thread, I provided you with the facts and you can choose to judge McCain based on those facts.

    Attempting to dismiss my case because the evidence doesn't explicitly support it however based on your narrow interpretation of a rule is, again, silly. If you'd like to maintain that position, then please show me how you'd respond to my earlier Clinton hypothetical:

    That's similar to asking for proof of Clinton lying once the Lewinsky facts broke through while implying that Clinton truly did forget or had amnesia or anything along those lines. Without a self-implicating statement from Clinton, how would you prove such a thing [that Clinton was in fact lying]?
     
  13. Repo Man Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,955
    You've not had a good thing to say about anything or anyone on this forum since you began posting here. If it is really so bad, why post here at all?
     
  14. zarlok Banned Banned

    Messages:
    116
    I don't care about clinton and your stupid ass hypothetical situation that is completely unrelated to the fact you have no evidence to support your claim that Mccain is a "liar". REPEATING SOMETHING OVER AND OVER DOES MAKE IT TRUE.
     
  15. zarlok Banned Banned

    Messages:
    116
    This is why I requested to know who pays the bills here. Sometimes people are aloof to how bad things really are. If they know how fucked up it is and simply dont care, then I won't be around. Bank on it.
     
  16. ashura the Old Right Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,611
    I'll take it then that you wouldn't have dared call Clinton a liar for the Lewinsky affair before he made a self-implicating admission, as there was no evidence available at the time that would support such a claim. After all, he could've forgotten, had amnesia, been under the influence of a date rape drug, etc. Sure he could have lied, but as there was no evidence to support that claim, you would never have accused him of such a thing. Even if some asshole repeated over and over again that Clinton was a liar, and that he was lying about the Lewinsky affair, that asshole's repetition, after all, wouldn't make it true.

    Gotcha.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  17. spidergoat Liddle' Dick Tater Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    53,966
    McCain is clearly trying to distance himself from his close relationship with a law firm, and by extension one of their clients, for whom he repaid a campaign loan and the use of a jet by using his influence on their behalf. The recent articles show this, although one may disagree with them.

    I don't see any absurd statements that can't be backed up, unlike, for example, suggesting that Obama is a Muslim.
     
  18. Repo Man Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,955
    Well, once you've contacted them and let them know that these forums have been overrun by LIEBERALS MARXISTS SOCIALISTS!!!1111!!!! OMG, they'll be sure to put things right.
     
  19. Avatar smoking revolver Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,083
  20. zarlok Banned Banned

    Messages:
    116
    I couldn't care less about their political disposition. I care about their bullshit agenda based edits/rules/posts. No wonder this place is a fucking graveyard-like shithole of leftist morons and your occassional arab apologist or zionist stooge who only waver from their leftist zealotry when Jews, Arabs and the middel east come up, all of which have zero reading comprehension or logical reasoning.
     
  21. spidergoat Liddle' Dick Tater Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    53,966
    We are sorry your Sciforums experience isn't meeting your expectations. Perhaps you will find what you are looking for elsewhere.
     
  22. Avatar smoking revolver Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,083
    We are?
     
  23. spidergoat Liddle' Dick Tater Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    53,966
    A full refund is available at the front desk.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page