Pretty much agreed, HOWEVER, is this not the "pseudoscience" section of the forum? What the heck right do the "frustrated" have to constantly IGNORE the facts and demand THEIR interpretation of "evidence" Photographs are evidence. UFO trace cases are evidence. Governmental documents are evidence. Expert Eye Witness testimony is evidence. When should I stop? I don't agree that people's frustrations should allow them a condescending right to badger and insult those who propose hypotheses without evidence to their satisfaction. I mean after all, what is pseudo science other than false science? If you ask me, which no one is assuredly, these find locals merely look for trouble and attention. I could understand if this was taking place on the, eh hem, legitimate sections of the forum.