I came up with this and it disturbs me a great deal. Eruvs Controversies I am glad to hear there is opposition to this infringement on public property. Demographic changes Legal status Well, if it constitutes permissible accommodation, who am I to argue? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eruv If I do argue I am in violation of religious rights? The slope is getting slippier with every declaration of "accommodation". I don't care if anyone wants to build a goat pen on his private property. Just don't build on my street, trespassing on my property, and preventing me from free movement on my own or public property which are maintained by my taxes. I object to such forced accommodations of "right to practice religion". I have a right to practice my non-religion without interference. That freedom is equally implied in the "Establishment Clause". Perhaps I am hasty in my assessment of this, but having lived in an occupied country, I am not very forgiving of granting "accommodations" to organizations that do not grant accommodations to me.