Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! Within this space-time we are all too familiar with aspects of matter which are exclusionary in nature, that is, properties which enforce a singleton behavior to the way all matter based entities occupy this space-time. In short no two objects can occupy the same space at the same time. When you plug a video cable into a video port on the back of your PC that port becomes occupied and cannot be re-occupied until you remove the current connection freeing the port, freeing the space-time it occupies for future connections. This behavior is taken for granted by our interpretation of reality. Even in circumstances that may seem to defy this behavior it doesn’t. For example two glasses of water poured into a vase may seem to occupy the same space at the same time but make no mistake even the molecules and atoms that compose this and every other fluid jostle each other and also any pollen grains in their midst for a singleton position in space-time. A thorough description of this behavior served Albert Einstein well when it earned him a Nobel Prize in 1921 for his paper on Brownian Motion. Such exclusionary behavior exists throughout nature in many different implementations and yet, not in others. For example electromagnetism is famously nonexclusive in the sharing or exposing its quantifiable degrees-of-freedom such as frequency, wavelength, polarization, intensity etc.. Otherwise we would all have to take turns enjoying our favorite stations on our fancy TV and radio sets. Electromagnetism travels outward from its source in waves and is constrained by the Higgs field to travel at or below the speed of light. Yet its DOF’s and the valuable information encoded therein simultaneously pervade the propagating waveform as it travels through space-time. As with all things in nature the specific magnitudes of these properties imprinted on the waveform immediately begin to circum to the laws of this universe so distance and weather may affect reception of your TV signal. Likewise the aspect of instantiation of the individual life responsible for the mobility of individuality in this space-time share exclusionary features that are more similar to matter even if in an unfamiliar implementation. Ones QE connection to metamatter (the LINE’s in the depiction) in Hilbert-space (the white area in the depiction) is similarly exclusionary in its behavior as it entangles your living host form wherever viable forms emerges within this universe (the cosmic disc in the depiction) . Each LINE is an entanglement described by a unique value among the infinite possibilities of the DOF’s of the entanglement spectrum (a property of Hilbert-space). One of these LINE’s belong to you, it always has and it likely always will, at least as long as Hilbert-space exists as it currently does. By natural entanglement ones LINE may non-relativistically connect any viable host in this universe with any metamatter in Hilbert-space (little circle at the ends in the depiction). And like matter, and the cable on the back of your PC, cannot be shared but must be terminated before a new entanglement, a new instantiation of you, a new life is established. This is the monogamistic, singleton or exclusionary nature of life. It is why one must die to instantiate anew. Which particles of matter or of metamatter participate or their location in this universe is completely inconsequential as both are completely transient. Which is what makes it so ridiculous to think matter is what defines ones individuality. Any matter and any metamatter will do just fine. Of course what any species may care most about is its form at least at first. So what influences may be brought to bear on this implementation to offer beings like us some semblance of control over our own instantiations? Ones entangled metamatter in Hilbert-space and matter in this universe is nonspecific and are currently biased toward a specific QEF only by circumstances that are quite arbitrary in nature. Nonetheless are governed and mediated by the rules of monogamy of entanglement and also by whatever influences happen to arise that might affect ones fidelity of teleportation (FT) and metamatter imprint. This mutual tuning of the Alice (DNA) and Bob (metamatter) components of individuality is the only means by which any possible control may be exacted. Though the entanglement spectrum must have existed for time untold even before the big-bang, this imprinting of stem-metamatter began when entanglement molecules first joined with other matter structures to form the first viable hosts for life. Ever since them eco-systems in this universe and their evolved living hosts has essentially tuned metamatter by storing information into this bootstrapping cloud-storage repository of nature. This began the propensity at first for eco-systems to become obtuse attractors of metamatter which had been imprinted by these eco-systems’ first generations of life which evolved and by chance still existed within its unique habitat. This describes the beginning of the process which tunes the individual FT and thereby biases instantiation to a particular eco-system. With time these components evolves to become progressively more finely tuned to individual LINE’s or QEF’s. Theoretically eventually this bias may evolve or may be manipulated to favor even specific familial DNA lines as metamatter becomes more finely imprinted by DNA and QEF. This begs the question; Can other eco-systems be targeted for specific individual instantiation by synthetically detuning or retuning ones imprinted metamatter to another ecosystems unique evolutionary signature?