Discussion in 'Earth Science' started by Duffy72, Aug 3, 2002.
Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.
Should I be seriously considering buying an aluminium foil deflector beanie. I have heard copper is better at this function though. What are your thought, Al or Cu.
Also, what are your thoughts on the implications of this site on your collective ideas. Could it be the US are trying to a avert a forthcoming catastrophe and not psychotronically control the population. Your input is eagerly awaited.
I suggest a few of you look into "punctuated equilibrium"...
FYI - Tom Beardon is one of the biggest crackpots ever to defame science.
He can dress up any amount of nonsense and make it sound plausible. Too bad it's all nonsense.
Hogwash and prove it?
Prove what - that people like Tom Bearden and Richard Hoagland are crackpots ? That's a good one. Nutters like Tom and his ilk have been proving quite adequately they're crackpots all by themselves.
But lets take a look at the site you provided:
Obviously, Bill Morgan admits he understands nothing of math or physics, yet advocates Tom Bearden's nonsense. Bill is a perfect example of how someone can easily be misled by Bearden and his pseudo-babble.
How then, are we to take Bill seriously if he doesn't even understand the first thing about science ? How then, can we take you seriously if you believe in that nonsense ?
Look where I found Tom Bearden's website listed. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Crank Dot Net | physics
Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Dr. Evil and Q, It seems these days that government informants will do anything to cover truths.
So you're a conspiracy theorist as well - what a surprise!
Just because an artical published about Oprah Winfrey is in the National Enquirer does that mean its true?
Tom Beardon is right on the money and so are you Dwayne!
Birds of a feather...
Scientists are particularly concerned about active sonar, which has the potential to harm and even kill whales and other marine mammals.
This is off topic. And of course, you've managed to change the topic once you've run out of arguments... again.
The "injure zone" for SURTASS LFA does not exceed 1 km. from its source. The Navy is well aware of this after conducting appropriate studies. They will use the device only when confident passive sonar does not pick up and significant marine life (whales, turtles, etc.) and in geologically restricted areas - high concentration of marine animals, for example.
So put a sock in it and get with the program Dr. Evil and Q It appears you lost your mojos!
Don't quit your day job. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
To answer your question - I don't watch TV or read the National Enquirer.
If you are asking if I believe everything I read the answer is no. That is
why I do research and investigate things for myself and then come to my
conclusions. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
I have not in any way, shape or form changed the subject!
Then please, if you will, explain how submarine sonar devices have anything to do with the topic, "Earths Magnetic Fields changing?"
btw - you might consider leaving out the "potty humor" in your responses.
you do know you can get meds for vaginal itch and dryness ??
over the counter too!!
ps: what are you wearing??
Look Q, your wasting my time!
Yes, that is the reason I've been placed here on Earth - to waste your time. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
fyi - this is a discussion forum - not a street corner for raving lunatics. If you don't like it - leave.
If your going to talk stupidness
Sorry, I never did learn Irrationallesse - perhaps you could give lessons. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
It looks like a big propane tank with a chimney on top.
You could have at least offered the link to the website you've blatantly plagiarised. No original thoughts of your own ?
i still got aroused darling!
Separate names with a comma.