Early technique in cutting stones

Discussion in 'General Science & Technology' started by arauca, Jan 11, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Trippy ALEA IACTA EST Staff Member

    Messages:
    10,890
    I'm not aware of any security issues with the website - I've been there before without problems, and I went there from work without problems.

    :Shrugs:
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. river Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,206



    fair enough
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. river Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,206
    Trip

    I went on the web site

    carpentry Trip

    are you taking this thread seriously ?
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. adoucette Caca Occurs Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,829
    Are you kidding?
    Archaeologists would have a field day, and there would be huge grants to study this and archaeological papers written about it by the hundreds, if there were actual evidence of an Alien visit.
    But alas, there isn't.
     
  8. adoucette Caca Occurs Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,829
    Mine too

    Opening this website may put your security at risk
    The website you wanted to see might transmit malicious software to your computer, or has done that before to someone else. It may also show signs of involvement in online scams or fraud.

    Address: http://www.oocities.org/unforbidden_geology/ancient_egyptian_copper_coring_drills.html
    Rating: Dangerous
     
  9. Trippy ALEA IACTA EST Staff Member

    Messages:
    10,890
    It's not about Carpentry, it's about stoneworking in ancient egypt.

    It's obvious you didn't bother taking the time to read, or understand what it had to say.
     
  10. Trippy ALEA IACTA EST Staff Member

    Messages:
    10,890
    Again, the only thing I can say is that I haven't had any problems with it (or warnings from it).
     
  11. river Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,206
    actually no , Archaeologists would be condemed and they have been

    are you ignorant of the politics of science
     
  12. adoucette Caca Occurs Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,829
    I don't think so, but hey, you seem to be in the know, so tell us, what archaeologists have been condemned?
     
  13. river Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,206

    none
    yet there is no mainstream thinking
     
  14. river Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,206
    what I'm trying to convey is this

    I don't expect mainstream historians and archaeologist to think outside the box
     
  15. Trippy ALEA IACTA EST Staff Member

    Messages:
    10,890
  16. Trippy ALEA IACTA EST Staff Member

    Messages:
    10,890
    You have yet to produce any evidence of, well, anything...
     
  17. river Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,206
    anything of what exactly ?
     
  18. adoucette Caca Occurs Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,829
    What?

    You just said that Archaeologists HAD been condemned.

    Then when I ask who was condemned you say NONE.

    Talk about back peddling.
     
  19. river Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,206
    true

    but who in the mainstream is about the truth of ancient history
     
  20. Trippy ALEA IACTA EST Staff Member

    Messages:
    10,890
    Anything requiring anything other than mainstream thinking.

    I mean, so far, the most interesting question you've posed is why this degree of precision (assuming the degree of precision you claim is actually present) should be required in the first place. And there's a fairly obvious answer to that involving spirituality and philosophy.
     
  21. adoucette Caca Occurs Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,829
    Are you kidding?

    If you want to be a famous archaeologist and get grants out the wazoo, then a SURE method would be to simply produce proof that Aliens had visited the planet before.

    The problem is you have decided what the truth is but don't have the evidence to back it up.

    Just arguments from incredulity.
     
  22. river Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,206

    no , not really



    if thats true , then the evidence is world wide

    yet is not in the mainstream thinking


    mainstream thinking

    as I thought
     
  23. adoucette Caca Occurs Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,829
    And yet actual Archaeologists would secure their name in their field by being the first to prove this claim, but for some reason are avoiding all this evidence.

    The fact is you make this claim that there is all this evidence but as yet you haven't produced any actual evidence, which is the same reason that Archaeologists aren't all over this. There is no evidence that stands up to scrutiny.
     
    Last edited: Jan 12, 2012
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page