at one point i hung out at $tormfront cos it fascinated. i am however far from a white supremacist, yet by glaucon's reasoning. i am indeed one mentally challenged? yes unfit for modding? yes
funny that do you ever hear me talk about "those old glory days"? i mean, i cringe when i read spookz
Not you.Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! Egads! You're turning into a lesser version of Wanda.
I had no expectations. I was waiting to see what would happen. It has turned into this funny as fudge debate! I didn't PM him, the mods weren't allowed to know either! Also, DID I ever refer to it anywhere as a scientific test...Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!...it was a test, but I don't think I would go so far as to say it was a scientific test.. OOGA BOOGA!!! Protest...did I protest... No, it was worth it! A lot of thoughts came pouring out afterwards. I simply catalyzed them! Can I have a sip... Agreed! Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! No, I am a guy. Who ever told you I am a girl was misleading you, unless they were confused as well. Thank you!
No? So you were clearly expecting something. http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=2523218&postcount=21 So now you admit it wasn't fit material for posting in Human Science from the start?
Your always funny! Lol...Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! I think that Stateofminds questioning of dreams is quite interesting. Dreams are something that scientists know very little about!!! OK...I might have been a little harsh in saying he is one of the worse. Instead I will say he isn't one of the best!!! Then again, ultimately I am not concerned, he is trying and I'll give him credit for that. In other forums I've seen moderators that sucked so hard core Dydiddlydoo would appear the Mod God when compared to them. Overall the mods here keep things interesting, and if they slip and fail to recognize every case that is only human. Dwydydymm...I've been wondering is that a G.I.Joe action figure you use as your avatar...more specifically is it a Cobra Commander picture...and if so why the choice...
Correct! I knew that results would appear. I did not know what results would appear. Thus, if there was any expectations involved, they would be that there would be results without presumptions attached to them. I find it very annoying when others put words in my mouth. Did I admit that it wasn't fit material from the start. No. Nor am I. I simply said I never recalled referring to it as a scientific test, only as a test. Your response leaves me wondering if in order to be fit material for the Human Science catergory one must post scientific tests...how many do we have...if I may ask..
Yet you have clearly stated that you got the results you were looking for. Hardly: re-read your own comments. You said it wasn't a scientific test yet you saw fit to post it in Human Science. Which part of the second word of the sub-forum's title escapes you? You decided to post a test you have claimed wasn't scientific in a science sub-forum. I.e. it wasn't fit material for that sub-forum. I wonder if that's why it's entitled Human Science? G.I. Joe? Pfft. I wouldn't recognise Cobra Commander if I tripped over him, it was never part of my culture. It's Grifter, from the WildC.A.T.s. And I'm a comics geek, it was either Grifter or Midnighter and I went with Grifter.
Yes, any results at all! It was indirectly related to the topic. Really... Thanks for clearing this up, I would have gone on thinking your a cobra commander wannabe otherwise. I'll have to check out this Grifter character, I haven't read any comics for so long now...it might be a good read!
Which is further evidence of the non-scientific status. Even no result would have been a result then. By "indirectly" you mean non-science in a science forum...
once again, a hardcore reductionist with his slavish adherence to dogma is elevated to a position of power in sci in human science of all places.....
Assumptions much? Like I have already told you: http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=2523256&postcount=38 I have to go with what I know and what I can find out. If J-B has any evidence he wasn't promoting pseudoscience then I'll reinstate the thread and apologise. As opposed to...?
a nuts and bolts science? what about the other schools of thought in psychotherapy? all junk science? what do you do if a friend has a panic attack? talk him down or treat him to the zoloft in your pocket? lookeehere, dwhatever go remove jo's infractions i bet you would find it liberating and whatnot
