Discussion in 'Alternative Theories' started by TonyYuan, May 27, 2020.
Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.
Yes they have .
But it doesn't explain what gravity is .
I really don't know this. Just like what a magnetic field is and what an electric field is, I can't answer. I just know there is something there.
In a quiet meeting, there are often duels of these two huge forces. But all we see is peace.
Without peace , we never understand the truth .
Humans still need to explore, and there are many, many unknown scientific fields.
Did James move the thread or not?
Tony, you sound like a nice bloke. I'm not sure if you are onto anything, but a word of advice....don't take too much notice of river. OK?
Why? River and I had a friendly and targeted discussion today. I think he's a good guy.
exchemist, Sorry, I will discuss some chemical problems with you in the future. Chemistry is one of my favorite subjects. I have won the National Olympic Competition Award.
Very funny. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
I hope you can show me your chemical muscles.
200 years ago, scholars were trying to modify Newton's gravity to improve its accuracy in calculating the orbit of planets. But in the end they all failed.
Today, I have derived a new gravitational equation, and it has been verified in the calculation of planetary orbit. This is enough to prove that this is a successful correction.
F = GMm/R^2 * [ (c - v) / c ]
Using this gravitational equation, we can accurately calculate the orbit of the planet. Why refuse it?
For the same reason YaunshenHao, Tony Wang and Tony2018 were banned from the .net site a few months ago, I imagine. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
How difficult is it for us to be able to make different voices in the scientific forum.
But even if it is blocked, we must stick to our correct ideas. Just like what Copernicus did hundreds of years ago.
So far no Journal is willing to publish my theory, because Newton and Einstein exist like two gods. How can their theories be challenged.
No scholar can find any flaws in my theory. But there are very few scholars willing to support my theory. But there are indeed a few doctors who support my theory. Thanks very much.
Some scholars once said that this is their home, and I now have a similar feeling. Here is free, friendly, equal, and has a good atmosphere for scientific research.
Some of my ideas come from the discussion here. I like to discuss. In this discussion, we will explode huge energy, we will show all our skills, and we will open all the inspiration. Doppler effect of gravitational field, it was first proposed in this forum, it also belongs to this forum.
I'm not saying anymore..its your choice, but first check out this thread.....
No it wasn't.
You "proposed" it on at least two other forums - one of which you were smartly banned from, and to which you then returned as several sockpuppets, all also banned, before you showed up here.
The Doppler effect of the gravitational field was the first time I proposed it in this forum. Is there any evidence for what you said?
I have put forward different views on SR in other forums. This is also the reason why I was banned. In this forum, I also came from this purpose. Of course, although the discussion was in-depth, I summarized the Doppler effect of the gravitational field.
I hope that our topic can focus on scientific discussions, not those unrelated things.
I used to want you to leave my thread, do you know why? Except you will say something useless, keep complaining, keep scolding, I don’t know what else you will do.
exchemist, hope you leave my thread again. Thank you!
Nope. You joined this forum on 17th March.
But on 21st February you posted this thread about the Doppler effect of gravity on another (nutcase) science site: http://www.scienceforums.com/topic/36585-doppler-effect-of-gravitational-field/?hl= doppler gravity
Separate names with a comma.