Does truth have many versions?

Discussion in 'General Philosophy' started by wegs, Jan 1, 2020.

  1. RainbowSingularity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,729
    lol
    flipping the narrative to apply your own anti-exclusivity statement to try and normalise your position to sell it to the readers

    lol Troll !
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    17,492
    Got any ranch dressing to go with that word salad?
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. RainbowSingularity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,729
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exception_that_proves_the_rule

    here is a picture of a Rancher who may need a Dressing

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. RainbowSingularity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,729
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exception_that_proves_the_rule
     
  8. RainbowSingularity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,729
    yes i would
    not only would i offer advice
    i would un-addict them

    keeping in mind the vast majority of people use drugs for dealing with emotional issues
    alcohol, sugar, Adrenalin...

    the main focus should not be the illegality and negative concept of the drug
    the main focus should be to deliver the addicts self control back to them.
    failing that then psychological re-structuring to undermine the psycho-active positive feed back of the drug(this is extremely risky & highly liable to result in serious suicidal idiation)

    the vast majority of drug addicts do not want to be drug addicts

    the except that proves the rule
    does not validate a solution to incarcerating all drug uses.

    the ideological metaphors of self indulgent wanna-be political leaders and religious conservatist anti drug charitys, do not solve addiction problems
    equally their ideology does not solve them either.
    unfortunately politicians have popularized concepts that simply do not work and make the situation much worse.

    do you want to be the exception
    or do you want to be the drug addict ?
    or the politician ?
    ... mad hatters tea party of deliberate miss alignment of the cause and effect of the service process to deliver a result for those effected(the addict)
    vilifying the addict to proclaim others to be the victims and thus usurping the rights of the addict to then victimize the addict is as close to evil as you can get without putting on a pair of horns

    most people don't care
    like i don't know
    they care enough to want to throw a stone at the problem.
    but not enough to learn about fixing it.

    they want it fixed for their own personal emotional satisfaction
    not the addict
    thus a massive miss alignment, more so when you have the politicians who pander to that idea to sell their own popularity on being tough on something.
    so they pick on those whom are weakest
    the addicts
    like a human sacrifice

    WeGs
    do you have a friend addicted whom you wish to help ?
    PM me any time
    keeping in mind,[turning it into a metaphor] some dont want help so you cant just give them free cups of teat and a biscuit to solve the problem by announcing them to now be rich with tea n biscuits.

    * do not take my tone personally, i am a little tired & have a headache
     
    Last edited: Jan 18, 2020
  9. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    17,492
    Good choice, going with the quote salad instead of the word salad. The word salad was a bit dry.

    (BTW you cannot un-addict anyone. Only they can do that.)
     

Share This Page