Does time exist?

What is the essence of movement?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Go back to my post # 1715

There you will find the Essence of movement .

Which is called also , " basic " . Same as essence . My definition .

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

NATURE OF TIME

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Time increases continuously from a pre-established moment.

 

The objectives of Philochrony are:

1- Teach the value of time. We learn to take advantage of every moment of our lives.

2- It allows us to organize sequentially our ideas and actions. We use calendars and agendas extensively.

3- It allows us to differentiate between the intervals of space (distance and length) and time (duration and chronology).
That is, we differentiate between time and space.

 

True

Yet none of these get to the essence of time itself . None

The essence of time is movement . The measurement of this movement is time .

 

I'm sorry, but I can't edit an old post.

Before, time was magnitive because it was objective, "imperceptible" and measurable.

Now, time is objective, "flowing" and measurable.

 

"Flowing" means (in Philochrony) a kind of motion, not spatial, but since a moment to another.

 

THE ARROW OF TIME: THE ANALOGY OF THE CASSETTE

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

...giving now the potential for eternality...

 

What do you mean?

 

Now could exist forever.

 

but it doesn't

 

Why not?

 

The speed affects the accuracy of the clock, but it doesn't travel in time. In the paradox of the twins the brother who travels to space only ages more slowly.

 

I think logically it actually exists. I find the scientific pondering s more likely. What benefit is it otherwise? hmmm it might not exist.

 

You can visit the thread titled GENONYMOUS TERMS in Linguistics:

Click on the link below:

http://www.sciforums.com/threads/genonymous-terms.161466/

 

A moment is an event with no duration, for example: now, already, beginning and end.

 

EDITION TO THE DEFINITION OF BECOMING

Before: Becoming is the continuous succession of irreversible moments.

Now: Becoming is the continuous succession of fleeting moments product of the movement.

The movements of the earth are universal because they affect everything that exists on its surface.

 

Just out of curiosity, what does it benefit to know if “time” exists as the fabric of Universe or not?

When people go watch a movie, do they care that it’s made up of individual frames running in succession?

It’s the experience that truly matters.