Duration exists without an observer . Time is subjective to the beings observation and position in their solar system .
no. was directed at River ✓ Thanks understood. I have river on Iggy hence my disconnect in short my point is that does time exist without an observer ? In short My position on TIME is well known TIME does not exist - period The only contrebution a intelligent sentient being brings is the ability to construct a arbitrary system of measurement to indicate AGE (existence) of physical items or detectable features of the Universe For something to exist it has physicality and can be detected No physicality or detectablity it does not exist As a example of something said to exist, LOVE, but does not exist. The reason for the confusion LOVE is a PROCESS not a INGREDIENT I'm sure you can think of other examples As far as emotions being time sensertive or time locked (correct me if this is incorrect reading by me) I recall watching the moon landing but it does not really feature in my life However watch a repeat and not only the emotions (plural) return but the memory of where I was and what I was doing Truth is I can recall what I was doing on demand as it relates to other frequent doings. In those moments the moon landing comes in second so to speak Enough raving Nearly coffee time Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Time does not exist . But does exist for those who measure duration , from the subatomic to the macro . That is the problem .
you are pretty spot on. as for love.(i am just musing on a biological level) my opinion is that love is a emotion of a higher brain function. like one might be capable of negotiation to create a better result for all partys. practical example 1 person sees a group of people and can percieve a better outcome for all, meanwhile various other partys only see conflict and opposing immovable concepts. love being an emotion that delivers a better result for all partys. while many like to lay claim to stating that love is something for all and something that all can freely have or choose. i wonder if its potential is more like an ability to comprehend something like a trait towards an ability. some(many ? given the right environment) may learn it some may have it as a natural ability some may never be capable of it various assortments inbetween etc etc...
My ignorance shows here as I cannot think of a equation with TIME within Reliant on AGE perhaps - I'm thinking here the half-life of elements Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
probably pragmatism rather than ignorance. i was being a little arguementative & flippant. 0 divided by distance 0 minus a distance infinity... etc... is time interchangable with the value of 0 ?
Since there are no units of TIME, only arbitrary units of AGE 0 divided by distance 0 minus a distance infinity... etc... is time interchangable with the value of 0 ? such questions not sense make Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
if we observe a difference in entropy (a quantitative mass eg the sun and its state of decay as you alluded to) now we remove ourselves from the point of observer. what have we removed ? time ? nothing ?
You have already answered - now we remove ourselves from the point of observer Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Is the plant the dog version of a human Porta-Potty? Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Time difference certainly exists as a symbolic relationship of energy/sound/matter/quantum/light/frequencies sequentially absorbed by the body's senses and arranged inside of the mind. Outside of the mind all this energy/sound/matter/quantum/light/frequencies are always present in a constantly shifting state based on the positive and negative reactions taking place everywhere in the universe at the same time.
