okay, i will accept that none? as in zero? got any sources for this statement, such as "science", "pubmed", or plos? according to "science" AND gould the rarity of transitional fossils, aka "missing links", is the trade secret of paleontolog step back and look at what you just wrote billy. the above reeks of creationism. i may be wrong but i think the cambrian layer proves you wrong. edit: http://www.fossilmuseum.net/Paleobiology/CambrianExplosion.htm end edit. and what if something on that order was found? instead of objectively analyzing the situation you will hear "fraud", deceit","fake","fluke", maybe even sabotage.