Once you leave logic and begin insults you have lost the argument. This is a litmus test. When science looks for life on other planets, do they look for replicators or for water? Water is where they assume life will begin, appear or thrive. Evolution starts at replicators, which is too late, and a weak foundation. I think evolution would not like to start earlier, just it does not know how. This is why it gets emotional out of frustration. We live in a world of specialists where the left hand does not know what the right hand is doing. There is no law of science that says the theory of quarks has to interface chemistry. How do quarks impact the formation of DNA? There is no interface. That is also a sign of a poor theory that exists in isolation. My pointing out poor theory is why I am not allowed to write on the science sections, as well as in the religion section. The staff gets too emotional.