Do you as a man have a sexual need for other men

Sorry Buddha1, I could not find your post where you stated your position on lesbians. Could you possibly type it out again please, or give me a link?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

I voted "no, never", but it occured to me that there could be an occasion when the services of a male pimp might be needful in acquiring access to an amenable female. Would you consider that a 'sexual need for other men'?

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

This is not my question and this is not what I asked.

I care little for wests misleading definitions.

Why do you parry my questions? Shows clearly that you are avoiding it!

Which means that you have no answer to my point that the anonymous poll would not show the right situation either.

As for the rest of you guys......I just want to say that I've already stated my position about the effectiveness of a poll anonymous or otherwise in determining the truth in this extremely sensitive issue for men.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

So spurious monkey you have avoided the points and questions I have raised anout:

- the sensitivity of an 'sexual preference' poll for straight men, even if it is anonymous.

- the definition of heterosexuality.

both are crucial issues in order to establish the truth about natural male sexuality. Because both come in the way of the truth.

Hence, I rest my case before all neutral people.

 

what makes you think the west cares about eastern misleading definitions?

heterosexual activity is natural buddha
it is natural
natural
keep saying that buddha, because it is true

but i do wonder why there is no research on the topic
and research with animals is not the same as himan research
it could be a topic that can not be researched

 

Which, of course, is why there is a poll to determine once and for all why it is a topic that can not be researched. Or, something like that?

 

Am I a "neutral" people?

I just don't know for sure. I mean, it appears that way.

 

Would it be best to restrict the poll to all neutered people, rather than all neutral people?

 

I don't know from which rock you crawled, but where I am from homosexuality is considered normal.

I gave you the scientific definition of heterosexuality. So far you have given none. When you say you are giving a definition you are not. You start rambling about 20 different topics. That shows how difficult it is for you to be objective about your own views and this suggests clearly that you have some kind of psyhological hangup about your own homosexuality. You still think it is a big thing to be homosexual while it is not. I'd imagine you grew up in some kind of conservative environment. Grow up and just admit what you are and don't try to defend your position by making it seem that the rest of the world is fucked up. You are fucked up. You have to deal with the issue at hand. Not the world.

 

Because they are not willing to discuss it.

Which actually shows that they can't --- because its part of the lies spread by the west.

Otherwise, instead of trying to avoid discusions and indulge in ascribing motives and accusations they would come on the table and discuss with an open mind.

 

YOUR'RE AVOIDING DISCUSSING THE DEFINITION OF HETEROSEXUALITY. UNLESS YOU COME TO THE TABLE TO DISCUSS THE DEFINITION I WON'T DISCUSS FURTHER WITH YOU.

 

I can bet you that all those who participated in the poll to say yes or no are neutered people.

 

“ Originally Posted by leopold99
what makes you think the west cares about eastern misleading definitions? ”

By Buddha:

"Because they are not willing to discuss it.

Which actually shows that they can't --- because its part of the lies spread by the west.

Otherwise, instead of trying to avoid discusions and indulge in ascribing motives and accusations they would come on the table and discuss with an open mind."
--------------------------------
You totally missed the point! They don't discuss it because they don't care about it. Don't get yourself all confused - it's just as simple as that.

 

They don't care about it, that's why the small but vocal bunch of you have got together to try to stop me? That is why this poll has been put up to counter me? That's why anomalous started a thread to get me banned?

You don't care? How many lies are you going to tell?

Sure you care! But when you're so obviously wrong, how can you defend yourself through a discussion.

 

I come here to pass the time. This forum, for me, is largely for relaxation. Along the way, if I can amuse, educate or inform others, and myself, so much the better.
I address your posts because you spout nonsense, you substantiate nothing, you claim victory when you have lost, etc

Anomalous is an idiot. May we agree on that.

When the person we are discussing with - you - refuses to study the evidence; misuses terms; does not understand the methodology of science; is delusional; then it does, indeed, become impossible to defend ourselves through discussion. Do you understand why that is not at all the same thing as losing the argument?

 

And how do you decide that.

What evidences have I ever refused to study?

the term misuse of terms is a matter of opinion --- why haven't you been able to spell out exactly why I've misused them?

I'm not writing a scientific paper here. I'm using scientific results arrived at by other scientists together with other evidences from our society --- including media reports. So you can't dismiss me on the basis of red-tapism.

 

Buddha1, I put it to you that you are deliberately ignoring my requests for your position on lesbians because the thought of firm breasts rubbing up against each other, and wet pussies, make you feel aroused, which goes against your theory that men are only sexually attracted to men.

 

a.) http://sciforums.com/showthread.php?p=965410#post965410

b.) I never said that men have sexual attraction only for other men.......Do you think by distorting what I'm saying you'll become right?

c.) Are you anomalous with another username?

 

a) Why thankyou

b) Well you could have fooled me.

c) Absolutely not

 

i said no. I am straight but i dont have a problem with gay people in fact i am good friends with someone who is gay. I dont see why your geting so steamed up about it to be honest. spurious monkey is just putting his thoughts in, no need to get all shouty about it.