Does seeing the fanatical need to support a defunct anti mainstream science application, get you so totally confused? You sound quite immature in the way you twist and misunderstand what is put to you. But anyway, I have always had a soft spot for kids....so,  The article I presented is by a reputable person, namely the Professor of Physics at Quest University Canada.  When I talk of peer review [as is the custom in mainstream science] we talk of getting a new model that may contradict or change an incumbent theory, getting peer reviewed....Is that clear?????  Now once again, if you have a new model, or new evidence to present [which you havn't as you are just offering up old rehashed nonsense] then you should get it peer reviewed. It may mean the Nobel prize for you.  And finally, if you are so stupid and immature as to have missed my reply twice on BH magnetic fields, you are obviously trolling as you have done so often here.