See James, here you are either being naive or arrogant. You think your argument would be the only persuasive one if there actually were any fence sitters (not that I think there are, I think that's BS on your part, sane people know right from wrong on this matter). BUT, _if_ there were fence sitters James, letting this guy have a voice might persuade them toward his point of view. You are potentially allowing that James. You are potentially allowing a paedophile to recruit people. Your short-sightedness in the matter astounds me.