An unnamed mainstream biology supposed-expert here at SciForums was asked this: Q. "Are there legitimate biologists in the I.D camp?" A. "Yes, they are, though I do not find support in their paradigms." Aside from answering the question with bad English for the way the question was posed, do you see the problem of this Darwinist? He says that I.D. biologists are legitimate, but that their ideas should not be taught. What is wrong with this picture? First one to guess which forum member I'm referring to gets a free weekend with Genji on a remote tropical island.