Darwinism Benefits Scientific Method?

Discussion in 'General Science & Technology' started by IceAgeCivilizations, Feb 1, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. IceAgeCivilizations Banned Banned

    Messages:
    6,618
    The Darwinites are pumped up!!!!
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Ophiolite Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,232
    Anyone with a brain can recognise that IceAge is poor at reasoning and equivocal in his responses.
    This should not cause us to reject ideas associated with his claims. Hamlet's Mill, which I referred to in an earlier post, explores evidence for knowledge of precession in ancient mythology. An objective review of the book and the ideas may be found here:
    http://alignment2012.com/mill1.htm

    Don't throw the baby out with the bath water.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. spuriousmonkey Banned Banned

    Messages:
    24,066
    Alfred Russel Wallace?
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Sarkus Hippomonstrosesquippedalo phobe Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,476
    I haven't read through all 11 pages of this thread so far, but please can someone tell me exactly where this has been said?

    Scientific progress does not need to based on fact - but merely on theories. If the theory holds (although remain fully unproven) for the necessary application then science can progress.
     
  8. IceAgeCivilizations Banned Banned

    Messages:
    6,618
    Ophiolite, von Dechend and de Santillana in Hamlet's Mill do well establish the ancient knowledge of precession measuring revealed in the precession numbers of ancient legends and architectures, the axis of the Earth having been known as the World Tree, the Djed pillar, the Sampo, etc., around which the constellations appear to rotate, because of the slow wobble of the Earth's axis.

    And as the ancients recognized the constellations of the zodiac, and knew that we move into new zodiac ages over time, and as the precession numbers such as 12, 24, 36, 54, 72, 108, and 432, are common in ancient legends, traditions, and architectures, they were measuring, obviously, the 72 years/degree of precession, we are discussing this on the "432" thread.
     
  9. Ophiolite Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,232
    Yet you have still utterly failed to explain how knowledge of precession, qualitative and quantitative, could lead to an accurate (or even an inaccurate measure of the Earth's diameter).
     
  10. IceAgeCivilizations Banned Banned

    Messages:
    6,618
    Why do you read the finding and then try to explain exactly where it's supposedly wrong?

    Until you and the other blowhards can say exactly how and why it's wrong, then you're just displaying your ignorance.
     
  11. Ophiolite Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,232
    Read which finding, where?
     
  12. IceAgeCivilizations Banned Banned

    Messages:
    6,618
    Read article #2 at the website listed with my profile.
     
  13. Oniw17 ascetic, sage, diogenes, bum? Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,423
    Your homepage? All I see is a book advertisement.
     
  14. IceAgeCivilizations Banned Banned

    Messages:
    6,618
    Open another eye.
     
  15. wsionynw Master Queef Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,309
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page