Creation took 5 days, not 7

Discussion in 'Religion' started by Ted Grant II, Sep 3, 2017.

  1. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,186
    Is that the best you've got for arguments you don't agree with?

    Just 'Nuh-uh'?
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Gawdzilla Sama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,797
    I wasn't aware that you had an argument.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,186
    Yes you were. You quoted it. And your response was content-free.

    As it stands, there are arguments for both sides of the whale/fish issue, neither one having much to stand on, without some evidence. Both are at least plausible, and neither are ruled out by sheer willpower.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Gawdzilla Sama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,797
    Yours depend on ancient man being very stupid. Didn't happen that way.
     
  8. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,186
    It would only be "stupid" if you were thinking of modern people. Why would you do this? This was 800 years before Christ - a half millennium before Aristotle.

    You have no argument that they made the distinction of how different sea creatures breathed. As others have pointed out, the concept of "mammal" wasn't even invented for more than another millennium.

    Note, BTW that it is not necessary to assert that the philosophers of the time did not know the difference, simply that the distinction was not exactly germaine to the parable.
     
  9. Gawdzilla Sama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,797
    See? You think 3000 years has made us that much smarter? That's stupid.
     
  10. exchemist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,329
    Quite. Especially since the Greek translation of the Hebrew, which other translations relied on, used a word that signified any large sea creature or "monster", without any regard to its biology.

    (One might venture to think that the existence of such a word might be evidence that the Greek people of the time did not discriminate that much on grounds of biology. That does not make them stupid, of course - it would just be a reflection of their priorities for describing the world.)
     
  11. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,186
    It is you who first introduced the word "stupid" and you who continue to insert it. I have made no such claim, regardless of how many times you try to put the word in my mouth.

    You've been beating on a strawman of your own creation. And that's because you have no support for your argument.
     
  12. sideshowbob Sorry, wrong number. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,207
    Not stupid, just different.
     
  13. Gawdzilla Sama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,797
    Okay, you're done.
     
  14. Gawdzilla Sama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,797
    Different enough that they could notice what drowned in what medium?
     
  15. sideshowbob Sorry, wrong number. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,207
    Different enough not to insist that that was the be-all and end-all only possible way to classify things.
     
  16. Gawdzilla Sama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,797
    I wasn't the one that was confused.
     
  17. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,186
    Yup. Just like this thread.
    Next.
     
  18. sideshowbob Sorry, wrong number. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,207
    W
    Well, you seem to be confused about the fact that the ancients don't have to be stupid just because they used a different method of classification than you do.
     
  19. Gawdzilla Sama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,797
    I see you didn't read any of my posts.
     
  20. sideshowbob Sorry, wrong number. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,207
    I read all of your posts. Otherwise I wouldn't have been able to reply to them.

    You're wrong in assuming that the ancients "would have" used a certain system of classification just because you think it's a sensible system. They could be just as sensible as you and use a completely different system.
     
  21. Gawdzilla Sama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,797
    Okay, you're done.
     
  22. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,186
    Hee. At this rate, Gawdzilla is going end up catatonic. He'll have no one left to speak to except those who agree with him.
     
  23. Gawdzilla Sama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,797
    I wouldn't want wrongness to be my friend.
     

Share This Page