Discussion in 'Astronomy, Exobiology, & Cosmology' started by TruthSeeker, Aug 14, 2007.
Who would want to eat that ? Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.
biology books contain lots of fiction, so when people learn about biology, they often become more stupid.
if humans are animals is a matter of definition, but the difference is so big and evident that it would be like saying that plants are animals, or that orange is red. ordinary people see this difference, so they don't call humans animals, but biologists have brainwashed many people to think that humans are animals, like physicists brainwash people to think that pluto is not a planet.
biologically there is no real difference between humans and animals... the difference is mental, spiritual.
I see that you haven't learned anything about it.
And here is the evidence.
Case in point.
You do know there's a difference between physicists and astronomers, don't you?
And "planet" is subject to a definition, one which Pluto now falls outside of.
There's something mental going on here.Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
astronomers are physicists, like cats are animals.
the problem is that the current definition is stupid. here's the perfect definition:
a planet is a thing that goes around another bigger thing. planets worship the sun.
a star is a thing which other things go around. for this reason, michael jackson is also a star.
but because stars go around the center of the galaxy, they are also planets, and planets are stars because moons go around them.
every particle, every consciousness in the universe is a star. you are the center of the universe.
but it doesn't matter if this is a perfect definition, because physicists are also the center of the universe, so it doesn't have to be perfect for them...
So asteroids and comets are also planets?
So stars are planets, meaning there are no stars as such?
I was aware that the entire universe revolved solely around me from an early age. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
they are all just big rocks in space. concentrations of energy. the sun is also a rock, but it's too big, so it can't be solid.
there are, because planets are stars.
people know it when they are born, but when they grow up they stop believing it (because adults are so childish). when you dream, the whole dream-universe revolves around you because you are its creator. it's like that in real life too.
Sun is a rock, mhm. Please stop embarrassing yourself and the failed education system.
Some aren't rock.
No it's gaseous.
Can't be solid if it's big?
Planets are stars?
Goes against your "perfect" definition.
Adults are childish so they stop believing childish things?:shrug:
if a planet is very big, it's gravity and magnetism are very strong too, so they create heat and nuclear reactions which makes the planet into a liquid shining ball (star).
I'm sorry but i have never seen this much bullshit on one page.. :roflmao:
It's not liquid, it's plasma. Lots of other bullshit in your post.
You skipped not only the biology classes, but physics as well, didn't you?
no need for insults.
Qe? Yorda himself said that learning biology makes you more stupid, so I guess he doesn't.
Besides calling star matter liquid is uneducated at best. No insults here.
in books it's made of plasma, but in reality it's made of liquid fire.
Define "liquid fire" and how it differs from plasma.
Magma is molten rock, not "liquid fire" - and if the sun were made of that then it wouldn't last long with the output it has.
And plasma usually is ionized gas, nothing to do with molten rock which is magma.
Any way I've put Yorda in my ignore list.
if the sun is not made of magma, why is there magma inside planets?
Separate names with a comma.