Then there were these two gems from Rossi in his blog: "Andrea Rossi February 28th, 2011 at 12:59 PM Dear “Renaissance Man”: Yes, I receive blackmails and threats, regularly, but the more I receive, the more I stick on my job. I got the precaution to leave to three persons of my trust all the papers necessary to make the reactors, to allow the respect of all my engagements (also toward the Mankind). But I want to tell you: during the Pyramids battle, a bomb passed few yards on the side of Napoleon; terrorized, his attendant asked him “what if that bomb caught you?” and he answered: if God wanted that bomb hit me, I could hidden myself in the center of the Earth and still it had hit me” Warm Regards, A.R." and "Andrea Rossi March 27th, 2011 at 8:12 AM Dear Mr Daniele Passerini: Your question is very important under a philosophycal point of view. To translate in English your questions, to allow all our Readers to understand, you are asking: 1- Since I am working in a scientific environment, why did I profess that I am a Christian catholic believer to answer a question in your blog? Shouldn’t a scientist be a Darwinian evolutionist? 2- How can I explain the existence of God after what happened for example in Japan ? About Darwinism: my opinion is that Darwinism can explain perfectly how living beings, vegetable and animals, have evoluted through the million years to make themselves more fit to survive, throughout a selection of the more fit characteristics. But I do not think that this can explain how humanity has evolved. The reason of my opinion is quite simple and practical, rooted in mathematic calculus of probabilities. If we want to sustain that humanity is evolved from protocellular beings, born from “casus”, then we have to admit that the possible combinations of casual beings are close to infinite. Therefore, spontaneous and casual evolution should have produced in our Planet millions of evoluted beings able to compete with humanity in the field of arts, culture, physics, politics, etc etc. The probability, under a mathematical point of view, that only humanity could be born from a casual evolution of DNA combinations are equal to zero, or, if you prefer, equal to 1 against billions, so much are the possible combinations of chromosomes structure and chromosomes series. But only one combination worked, the one who brought to the existence of humanity. To sustain that the casus has brought only humanity is as probably wrong as to sustain that in billions of billions of planets in the Universe only the Earth contains living beings. A Darwinian evolutionist could sustain that no other evoluted being exists in the earth able to compete with humanity because of the selection. But also this is unsustainable: no evidence exists in the archeology of evoluted beings defeated from humanity and extinguished for this reason. Humanity has fought against animals, not against other forms of evoluted beings, where evoluted beings means living beings able to change through experience their way of life, producing art, science, politics…(no, politics no..). 2- How to make compatible what happened in Japan (and in Holocaust, and in many other unacceptable situations) with the exhistence of God? To ask me this is as to ask my dog about the correlations between the universal relativity of Einstein and the quantum chromodynamics. I can’t read the mind of God. But I have a doubt, about what happened in Japan: are we sure that all the atomic bombs explosions tested in the Pacific Ocean did not change the configuration of the bottom of the sea in that area? I read that few inches of displacement of the bottom sea has caused that disaster… Thank you for your questions, Warm regards, A.R." Like WTF really. At that point I thought to myself "did such a lunatic actually make one of the greatest discoveries ever ?" I think he got this guy Foccardi and then told him he was going to work on a way to produce more power from the concepts he had helped develop and then wham by god he found it, what he really found was a way to trick those who want to believe that it is in fact producing more power by way of a poor test. But again, I seriously hope that I am wrong. However, the more he speaks, the more that is revealed, makes me believe he and his invention a fraud, scam or a big mistake in data interpretation.