Contrary to Sceptics line, I believe scientists are responsible for explaining thier creations to the public. They have signally failed to do this with GM and the anti-response is a direct result of this. Far from being naieve as Sceptic suggests, I am merely pointing out a statement in fact. It is supremely arrogant to suggest that the public should just adopt whatever we create without question. Arrogant and foolish. If scientists want GM accepted, they have to come down out of thier ivory towers and interact with the public. Why is this so hard to understand? There is no better way of dispelling "disinformation" than a dialogue with the public in an open arena. The pro-GM lobby balk at this..Why? You yourselves are creating the situation you are complaining of. You could do a hell of a lot to remedy the situation, but whinge and whine and complain instead. You bring nothing to the table, and yet expect carte blanche to do what you want. Sorry. It just doesn't work like that.