Chinese Scholar Yang Jian liang Putting Wrongs to Rights in Astrophysics

Discussion in 'Pseudoscience' started by heyuhua, Apr 22, 2018.

  1. Q-reeus Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,056
    As per last para in #750, there is a very well experimentally verified requirement for energy-to-matter conversion: pair production: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pair_production
    Can you cite a single example where creation of say an electron is not always accompanied by a conjugate positron? In any given particle collision event, collision energy may be sufficient to create a single particle, say a charged particle, but CPT symmetry requirements don't allow it. It's not possible to create even a single atom of just hydrogen via energy-to-matter conversion. With extreme care, the best to hope for would be an atom of hydrogen and anti-hydrogen. Via a very difficult containment and selective interaction route for the anti-proton and positron conjugates of proton and electron which must have also been created initially. Sooner or later, the delicately prepared and isolated anti-hydrogen atom would annihilate with matter and only radiation remains.

    If your mitosis theory is true, it needs to explain why and how established particle physics CPT symmetry rules can be flouted to allow ordinary molecular matter to preferentially be generated.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. heyuhua Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    432
    the mitosis of the nucleon is the result of the work done by the space-time expansion force on the nucleon, that is, it is a cosmological effect,this effect can only turn out on a large scale and over a large period of time, and there is no contradiction with the usual conservation laws, which is established without considering the expansion of space-time, or say that the usual laws of conservation reflects physical phenomena in a small range and in a short period of time , and need to make corresponding changes in a large scale and a large period of time. In short, although nuclear mitosis cannot be proved by existing particle physics, they're not contradicting
     
    Last edited: Aug 4, 2018
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. heyuhua Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    432
    You can also think about the creation of nucleons in this way. The negative pressure in celestial bodies is equal to the negative energy field, tith the expansion of time and space, Particle and antiparticle turn out at the same time, the antiparticle is in a negative energy level, not observable, and the particle is in a positive energy level.The sum of energy of particles and antiparticles is zero, corresponding to P+ rou (density)=0. When a few antiparticles move to a positive energy level, they become observable antiparticles. so, not noly explains the generation of particles, but also the asymmetry of positive and antimatter
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. heyuhua Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    432
    You can also think about the creation of nucleons in this way. The negative pressure in celestial bodies is equal to the negative energy field, and with the expansion of time-space, particle and antiparticle turn out at the same time, the antiparticle is in a negative energy level, not observable, and the particle is in a positive energy level.The sum ofenergy of particles and antiparticles is zero, corresponding to the relation P+ rou (density)=0. When a few antiparticles transit to a positive energy level, they become observable antiparticles. So, not noly explains the generation of particles, but also the asymmetry of positive and antimatter
     
  8. heyuhua Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    432
    where does James R go? have you read Yang's paper?
     
  9. heyuhua Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    432
    where does James R go? have you read Yang's paper?
     
  10. heyuhua Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    432
    where does James R go? have you read Yang's paper?
     
  11. heyuhua Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    432
    where does James R go? have you read Yang's paper?
     
  12. heyuhua Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    432
    Is James R hidden? Can't you stick to the truth? Is my post pseudoscience?
     
  13. heyuhua Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    432
    NotEinstein thought that the theory that the majority supported or approved was truth, which was obviously wrong. The front of truth was often first recognized by a few and then drove everyone. Besides, there was no absolutely correct truth. Truth has evolved from the lower to the higher, and that inflexible point of view has always been a hindrance to the progress of science.
     
  14. sideshowbob Sorry, wrong number. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,257
    That's the crank's mantra.
     

Share This Page