Man, this is bullshit! I made my Sandy Hook thread in the conspiracies section of this website, and it got locked. This forum needs more, y'know, FREE SPEECH!! I mean, you would think in the year 2018, people would be more open-minded, but I guess not, unfortunately.
Probably a wise decision. Not sure of the rules here, but on the forum I moderate we have a rule that says "Posts that contain material that we deem to be blatantly or unnecessarily racist, sexist, homophobic, bigoted, pornographic, or otherwise offensive, may be removed." I prefer intelligent discussion to the sort of tripe you posted, myself. But if you are into that sort of tripe I am sure there are plenty of white supremacist and Nazi sites that would welcome such posts. They might be a better choice than a science forum.
OOOOOOHHHHH, DAMN!! SICK BURN!! Well, y'all shouldn't have locked it so soon; maybe y'all should of waited to see if anything worthwhile would come from it before locking it...
Well, I don't want to go to an echo chamber with people who have the same opinions; I want to go to a forum that has people with diverse opinions to challenge my opinions.
I did not lock it. If you had anything worthwhile you should have started there. Anyways if something gets locked it gets locked...there is no need to get bitter and twisted... Alex
OK what is your opinion on something and I will tell you that you are wrong. But I have to go now... Alex
You might be surprised what gets flagged around here. I've come to accept it and leave it to the moderators to sort it out. If they have a problem with content, I leave it to them to deal with it. It seems subjective at times, but...whatever.
Mod Note Errorist has been banned for being a racist and bigoted white supremacist. While sciforums is open to various discussions, we will not accept or allow hate speech, which Errorist took time out of his day to post on this site. From this site's rules: Hate speech and stereotyping I6. Hate speech, defined as the vilification of groups of people based on their race, religion, country of origin, sex, sexual orientation, political affiliation etc. is not tolerated on sciforums. I7. Stereotyping a member based on his or her membership of a group (e.g. his or her race, religion, country of origin, sex, sexual orientation, political affiliation) is unlikely to be conducive to civil discussion and will usually attract moderator attention. It is acceptable to point out similarities and differences among groups, but only as long as this is supported by argument or evidence. I8. The use of vulgar or demeaning words to describe a group of people – particularly a group that includes a member whom you are addressing – is unacceptable.