Censored, Again?!

Discussion in 'The Cesspool' started by Errorist, Feb 16, 2018.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Errorist Banned Banned

    Messages:
    24
    Man, this is bullshit! I made my Sandy Hook thread in the conspiracies section of this website, and it got locked.



    This forum needs more, y'know, FREE SPEECH!!

    I mean, you would think in the year 2018, people would be more open-minded, but I guess not, unfortunately.
     
  2. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,635
    Probably a wise decision. Not sure of the rules here, but on the forum I moderate we have a rule that says "Posts that contain material that we deem to be blatantly or unnecessarily racist, sexist, homophobic, bigoted, pornographic, or otherwise offensive, may be removed."
    I prefer intelligent discussion to the sort of tripe you posted, myself. But if you are into that sort of tripe I am sure there are plenty of white supremacist and Nazi sites that would welcome such posts. They might be a better choice than a science forum.
     
  4. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Xelasnave.1947 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,502
    You must be open minded cause your brain fell out.

    What do you expect your thread was stupid.

    Alex
     
  6. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Xelasnave.1947 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,502
    Maybe give he should give them a go.
    Alex
     
    Last edited: Feb 16, 2018
  8. Errorist Banned Banned

    Messages:
    24
    OOOOOOHHHHH, DAMN!! SICK BURN!!

    Well, y'all shouldn't have locked it so soon; maybe y'all should of waited to see if anything worthwhile would come from it before locking it...
     
  9. Errorist Banned Banned

    Messages:
    24
    Well, I don't want to go to an echo chamber with people who have the same opinions; I want to go to a forum that has people with diverse opinions to challenge my opinions.
     
  10. Xelasnave.1947 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,502
    I did not lock it.
    If you had anything worthwhile you should have started there.
    Anyways if something gets locked it gets locked...there is no need to get bitter and twisted...
    Alex
     
    Last edited: Feb 16, 2018
  11. Xelasnave.1947 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,502
    OK what is your opinion on something and I will tell you that you are wrong.
    But I have to go now...
    Alex
     
  12. Errorist Banned Banned

    Messages:
    24
    I want the thread to be taken out of "The Cesspool" and unlocked.
     
  13. Bowser Namaste Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,828
    You might be surprised what gets flagged around here. I've come to accept it and leave it to the moderators to sort it out. If they have a problem with content, I leave it to them to deal with it. It seems subjective at times, but...whatever.
     
  14. Bells Staff Member

    Messages:
    24,270
    Mod Note

    Errorist has been banned for being a racist and bigoted white supremacist. While sciforums is open to various discussions, we will not accept or allow hate speech, which Errorist took time out of his day to post on this site.

    From this site's rules:

    Hate speech and stereotyping
    I6. Hate speech, defined as the vilification of groups of people based on their race, religion, country of origin, sex, sexual orientation, political affiliation etc. is not tolerated on sciforums.

    I7. Stereotyping a member based on his or her membership of a group (e.g. his or her race, religion, country of origin, sex, sexual orientation, political affiliation) is unlikely to be conducive to civil discussion and will usually attract moderator attention. It is acceptable to point out similarities and differences among groups, but only as long as this is supported by argument or evidence.

    I8. The use of vulgar or demeaning words to describe a group of people – particularly a group that includes a member whom you are addressing – is unacceptable.
     
    RainbowSingularity likes this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page