Cancer cure hypothesis

Discussion in 'The Cesspool' started by Selfexprt.SJ, Apr 16, 2018 at 9:36 PM.

?

Can you disprove it?

This poll will close on Apr 23, 2018 at 9:36 PM.
  1. Yes

  2. No

  3. It Needs to be tested

Results are only viewable after voting.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Selfexprt.SJ Registered Member

    Messages:
    30
    Introduction

    Cancer is a commonly known ailment in many species, commonly known to result in the victims demise. I won't waste too much time covering widely known information.

    Thesis

    •Cancer is caused by ‘lack of oxygen’ in the creation of new tissue.
    •High Ph levels are caused by drinking almost 0% sugary/pre-mixed liquids.
    •High Ph levels result in curing cancer through permitting more oxygen to be used in cell reproduction.
    •breathing slightly less results in a gray area between consciousness, unconsciousness and results in cancer
    •lack of oxygen in tissue is caused by ‘blocking’ oxygen from entering tissue in sufficient levels, due to lack of room in the tissue to support the ‘oxygen presence’ (and/or) insufficient oxygen entering the body through breathing, yet not such an insufficient amount to cause unconsciousness.

    Factors

    ‘X’ environment in the body to prevent oxygen to create new tissue.
    tissue is created, recreated on a regular basis. If the body has lack of vitamins, minerals, protein, and less than two glasses of unmixed water per-day while too many carbohydrates… well yes, the unhealthy foods/drinks they're consuming to maintain energy, wakefulness, and hydration, are causing an environment in the body which pushes oxygen out of fully ‘tainted or blocked’ body parts resulting in cancer growth.
    The lack of oxygen is also potentially caused by ‘hiding breathing’. Some individuals have louder breathing then other individuals. As a result I made a educated assumption which is “some individuals train themselves to breath less, or more slowly, in order to achieve satisfactory silence in breathing”
    The effort required to change one’s breathing ‘schedule’ is actually simply a small amount of dedication before the result becomes permanent and unnoticeable to the person making the change.
    They then have almost not enough oxygen to maintain 100% of their bodies cell creation resulting in cancer growth, and potentially its spread after less oxygen is available.

    Current studies

    High Ph levels: ph is the solubility in the bodies blood, and I strongly believe this is a result of high levels of pure hydration, as opposed to hydration through water which is pre-mixed with other materials/foods/sugar etc.
    The ‘pure hydration’ allows for more solubility in all parts of the body, including tissue, since as we know “the water with sugar in it has ‘space taken’ in its solubility.”
    We also know that water makes up a high percentage of tissue compared to other materials used in tissue recreation. All body parts have a level of water included in the tissue.
    Conclusion: unmixed water creates more solubility in all tissue, allowing for nutrients to travel more efficiently through tissue, and through the blood.

    The point? It is suggested here that many or specifically ‘X=percent of people ailed by cancer’ are often drinking store bought beverages, or coffee, etc. rather then drinking enough pure water, hence lowering Ph levels. Thus, drinking more water would allow more oxygen to be used in the creation of cells.

    (Hypothetical) The Cure

    Cancer is reversible through i) in mild cases, possibly more breathing, usually a less ‘acidic environment creating’ diet (less sugar/appropriate vitamins/minerals/protein), and more clean water.

    In more severe cases, I suggest oxygen treatments (in addition to the previous treatment)

    Conclusion

    more quick and/or deeper breaths depending on current breathing is likely required, especially in a smoking individual. Sometimes, oxygen treatments could be required in heavily hindered lungs in an individual. And most importantly and likely the most common factor is poor levels of healthy hydration which blocks oxygen from entering the cellular reproductive process at appropriate levels resulting in (lack of oxygen=cancer growth)

    Notes

    A few other noteworthy comments are the grease from beef/bacon (as an example) may be contributing to the ‘tainting’ the environment mentioned earlier, when consumed daily.

    The reproductive process cells undergo may not be driven by oxygen, thus may continue forward without oxygen much like an internal-combustion-engine would without oil.

    The cells recreate, then without the oxygen appear cancerous.

    The cancer spreads from a further reduction in either breathing or ability in the tissue to contain enough oxygen.
     
  2. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. spidergoat Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    52,741
    Nonsense. Cancer needs oxygen like all tissues to survive.
     
  4. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Selfexprt.SJ Registered Member

    Messages:
    30
    Tissue 'obsorbs' some things, why not osmosis from surrounding tissue or 'stealing' the oxygen also encouraging a spread of the cancer
     
  6. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Selfexprt.SJ Registered Member

    Messages:
    30
    perhaps even simply a lack of sufficient oxygen..
     
  8. Selfexprt.SJ Registered Member

    Messages:
    30
    or perhaps the tissue dies shortly after creation, or is created dead.. in which case it's simply being created to die shortly later due to the lack of survival needs
     
  9. origin Trump is the best argument against a democracy. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,227
    This is not science, this what could be termed an alternative theory. I will ask the mods to move it to that section.
     
  10. Selfexprt.SJ Registered Member

    Messages:
    30
    My apologies, though I deemed 'cure' validating it as science.. after all, science is the study of (insert anything here) and seeing if we can repeat the result... so as far as I know..
     
  11. origin Trump is the best argument against a democracy. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,227
    You need to have at least a rudimentary understanding of the subject before you can make viable hypotheses.
     
  12. Selfexprt.SJ Registered Member

    Messages:
    30
    a systematically organized body of knowledge on a particular subject.
     
  13. Selfexprt.SJ Registered Member

    Messages:
    30
    i believe viable means it works...
     
  14. origin Trump is the best argument against a democracy. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,227
    Come on...
    ph is the solubility in the bodies blood?

    These kind of statements kind of destroy your credibility.
     
  15. Selfexprt.SJ Registered Member

    Messages:
    30
    Ph levels are solubility, aren't they? The statement was to point reference
     
  16. origin Trump is the best argument against a democracy. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,227
    No, pH is the negative log of the concentration of the hydronium ion.
     
  17. Selfexprt.SJ Registered Member

    Messages:
    30
    Do you hear that, staff members? They're attacking me, my choice of words, and not my hypothesis... smells like victory

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    Btw, google told me Ph is this..

    A measure of acidity or alkalinity of water soluble substances (pHstands for 'potential of Hydrogen'). A pH value is a number from 1 to 14, with 7 as the middle (neutral) point. Values below 7 indicate acidity which increases as the number decreases, 1 being the most acidic.
     
  18. spidergoat Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    52,741
    You don't even know that tumors grow their own blood vessels?
     
  19. Selfexprt.SJ Registered Member

    Messages:
    30
    Anyone care to explain that this is uncharted territory?
     
  20. Selfexprt.SJ Registered Member

    Messages:
    30
    Anyway, I said what I came to, so peace out people whom probably think blood vessels can't appear in something that we haven't a thing to say is just like it
     
  21. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,207
    Can you support any of these assertions?

    Can you support this assertion?
     
  22. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,360
    Nope. In fact, cancer is sometimes treated by preventing oxygenation of new tissue.
    A "0% sugary liquid" would be water, and that does not cause high pH levels.
    Nope. High pH levels increases hemoglobin's affinity for oxygen. This means it "hangs onto it" harder and does not release it into tissues.
    Meaningless babble.

    I stopped at this point. Perhaps do a little reading if you want to be taken seriously.
     
  23. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    30,931
    Selfexprt.SJ:

    Okay, so you have this hypothesis. What's next?

    Also, have you conducted a literature view to identify potential problems with your hypothesis? Which sources have you consulted?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page