If you look at the police shootings of the black men; black lives matter, the Democrats have demonstrated they are not good at analyzing data. The current and past shootings of black men, by the police, was not exactly racist. The reason is, very few if any black women have been shot by police. If it was racist, wouldn't one would expect both black men and black women to be shot, since only color would matter in these shootings? In the past, racism meant separate rest rooms for white and blacks, or back of the bus for blacks, applied to both black men and black women. Since only black men are being shot, one can argue that the data also adds up to sexism element against men. Who teaches that? Hillary will not get prosecuted for her illegal server, because she was found to be careless, due to being clueless about the distinction between handling classified and personal data. To her there was no distinction. She does not even see the sexist angle in the data. She may once again have good intent but she is once again cluelessly misinforming her base, who will then draw erroneous conclusions from unreliable premises. The question I have is, how did racism against blacks morph in a sexist version of racism? The democrats invented both, with the poor data skills causing two things to merge. They showed their cards when they sneezed.