Well as been said, flapping isn't necessarily the way to go, but we know about what it takes to build an actual ornithopter: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0E77j1imdhQ It weighs 42 kg and has a 32 meter wingspan (which should also give you an idea of how much weight/wing area is/can be involved.) and it has sustained both altitude and airspeed for 19.3 seconds, but AFAIK, no one has been able to get one to take off completely on it's own, from level ground, in no wind conditions. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t4VoYrm-wjU Of course duration/distance/turning has been a challenge for all of these human powered craft. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lc7q6l7c32I&feature=related
I've watched that snowbird video like 20 times now. I just love the shot of it taking off with the rising sun in the background...with a perfect choice of background music...and it's graceful wing flaps starting as the music builds. Nice job on the video editors part.
Yeah, but I'd not fly any of these current human powered craft higher than I cared to fall. They are built trading weight for reserve strength and are pretty much at the very edge of required strength and thus tend to have zip capacity to handle additional loads that would be imposed in gusty conditions. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ygFSc7XNrMw
And it's been done with a Helicopter as well: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aR2CV1OeUdU http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q70tM5sDQhc
What kind of control would you want that you do not have in a wingsuit? Birds die due to midair collisions and landing problems as well. We live on a canyon in San Diego and the edge of the canyon is often littered with birds with broken necks who fly into trees, walls, wires etc The air is a dangerous place.
A wing suit is not flying, it is semi controlled falling. Little birds die when big birds slam into them and then they get eaten. The air is a dangerous place, but it's not the air that hurts you, it's the trees. wall, windows etc. And even among birds, flying is still the statistically safest way to travel, don't you know. Notice, I said "[died] because of air they could not deal with. Things birds handle quite easily." I did NOT say that birds could handle ALL conditions.
So is hang gliding. You can gain altitude in both sorts of vehicles, but at the end of the day you are still going to have to land. (And in both cases you can add a powerplant if you want to remain aloft longer.) Yep. And when they just plain run into things. Trees, skyscrapers, power lines, towers, cliffs - all hazards. Agreed - and that sudden stop that happens once you encounter them.
You know very little about hang gliding. At the end of a good day of flying a hang glider, landing is good if there's a cold beer waiting. And you cannot 'gain altitude in a wingsuit.
Skeptical me says, I doubt it. But by all means, convince me if you can. Any wing can turn speed into increased lift by raising the angle of attack, but intuition says there isn't enough wing area in a wingsuit to translate that increase into anything more than a brief reduction in speed. It may feel like a gain in altitude to you, but I seriously doubt there is an actual gain in altitude.
Billvon, is this what you are talking about when you say "wing suit" because I really can't see you being able to gain altitude with this little wing area: http://movieclips.com/Ds9L-transformers-dark-of-the-moon-movie-featurette-wingsuit-stunts/ If you look at the downward velocity that has to be reached before they even become effective at "flying" there would have to be one heck of an updraft (sustained at >100 mph?) to translate that small amount of surface area to a positive rate of climb.
After all this, and a similar thread being started, I did some Googling, and it turns out Jarno Smeets was so wrapped up in his clams, he decided to fake a video of his man powered ornithopter and post it online: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYW5G2kbrKk&feature=player_embedded#! Maybe he was using SF as a litmus test to see how many people would fall for his hoax?